Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRudolf Johnston Modified over 9 years ago
1
HOT Lanes on I-77 More Questions Than Answers Feb 22, 2013
2
The Problem Congested stretch of four lane road from exit 23 to exit 36
3
The Latest GP Lane Estimate Four lanes from 23- 28; two from 28- 31: ~$75M Source: “I-77 HOT Discussion with Cornelius Town Board”, email from Bill Coxe to Andrew Grant, Oct. 10, 2012 A ballpark cost for two GP lanes from exit 23 to exit 36: $80- $130M
4
The Current HOT Lane Proposal Source: “I-77 HOT Lanes Project Overview NCSITE Lunch N’ Learn”, August 21, 2012; “I-77 Widening Update”, MUMPO (Bill Coxe), Sept 19, 2012; “Billions invested in Roads”, Charlotte Observer, Jan 14, 2013 27.5 Miles of HOT Lanes Cost: $550 Million
5
GP vs HOT HOTGP 27.5 Miles $550M 13 Miles $80- 130M (est)
6
Cost Breakdown -$M Source: “Billions invested in Roads”, Charlotte Observer, Jan 14, 2013
7
HOT Lane Funding- Public* Source: NCDOT *Maximum contribution of public funds
8
Mobility Funding Source: “Mobility Fund Project Scoring,” NCDOT, 2012 I-77 GP Lanes- 20pts less, but still ~#4 out of 95 projects (top 5%) I-77 GP Lanes Still A Good Candidate for Mobility Funds
9
HOT Lane Funding- Federal Source: NCDOT Looking at the largest bucket of money…
10
From the NCDOT- Part I Q: Do GP lanes qualify for NHPP funding? A:“Building general purpose lanes on I-77 would be an eligible expenditure of NHPP funds.” Source: NCDOT
11
From the NCDOT- Part II Q: “Is there some advantage to obtaining funding for HOT lanes vs GP lanes under NHPP?” A:”There are many factors that would be included in an analysis to determine whether it is better to build general purpose lanes or HOT lanes. The type of funding (funding source) would not be one of them.” Source: NCDOT
12
From the NCDOT- Part III Q: “Does Federal funding (NHPP) receive a higher priority due to HOT lanes?” A:”Each state is appropriated a specific amount of NHPP funding....we are going to get the same amount of NHPP from the feds funding regardless of what projects we build. The feds play no part in the selection process for projects that use NHPP funding.” Source: NCDOT So Federal Funds are NOT tied to HOT lanes!
13
A Recent $1B Road… Triangle Expressway First toll road in NC Connects Durham to Holly Springs Initial traffic project: 20K VPD Actual traffic: 6K VPD Source: Hartgen & Associates
14
HOT Lanes and Congestion HOT lanes rely on congestion “Congestion Pricing” means more congestion = more toll revenue
15
HOT Lanes & Congestion- County HOT lanes are expected to have “minimal impact to the travel speed in the existing general purpose lanes.” Source: “Comments on Environmental Documents for TIP Projects I- 3311 C and I-4750 HOT”, MUMPO memo dated October 4, 2012
16
HOT Lanes & Congestion- State Source: “Managed Lanes: More than a Revenue Tool”, Parsons Brinkerhoff, 2013 For the long term, “congestion returns only to the general purpose lanes.”
17
HOT Lanes and Congestion - Federal “No one wants congestion in the GP lanes. So the express lane provides an option, not a full solution. Indeed, if congestion in the GP lanes ever dissolves, than (sic) the incentive to use an express lane would dissolve too.” Source: FHWA, Feb 4, 2013 HOT Lanes Do Not Relieve Congestion- They Ensure It
18
HOT Lanes & the Future Unplanned Revenue Impacting Facility Compensation Event Physical Constraint Source: “I-77 HOT Lane Project Discussion with Cornelius Town Board”, email from Bill Coxe to Andrew Grant, October 15, 2012 HOT Lanes on I-77 for 50 years…
19
Some Existing HOT Lanes CA 91 ORANGE COUNTY I 15 SAN DIEGO I85 ATLANTA US 290 HOUSTON
20
I-77 HOT Lanes Mooresville Davidson Cornelius Huntersville Combined Population: ~150,000 Source: US Census Bureau, 2010
21
Economic Burden Approx Population Supporting One Mile of HOT Lane People (Thousands) LKN Citizens Bear >15x the Burden of Other HOT Lanes Source: “A Guide for HOT Lane Development,” FHA, 2003
22
HOT Lane Revenues Source: “Managed Lanes: More than a Revenue Tool”, Parsons Brinkerhoff, 2013 Estimated Required Revenue for I-77 HOT Lanes: $25-30M I-15 UT (Similar Population to CLT): $600K Large gap between required revenues and revenues from population
23
SC vs NC: Tax Comparison Source: NC Fast Facts 2013, John Locke Foundation; tax-rates.org; sctax.org; taxfoundation.org Stepping Up to the Plate with Two Strikes Against Us…
24
LKN vs Rock Hill (York County) 93 miles of highway improvements 87 miles of County gravel roads upgraded and paved 16 bridges repaired, replaced or widened 84 major intersections improved “What Do You Need?”“There’s No Money!” York- Since 1997 LKN Source: “Pennies for Progress” website, Phase I and Phase II
25
6 Lanes 8 Lanes HOT Lane 6 Lanes Location 8 Lanes 6 Lanes
26
From a business perspective, HOT lanes… Are a red flag the road is congested Indicates the state/municipality is unwilling or unable to invest in infrastructure Siphons discretionary income out of the local economy
27
HOT Lanes on I-77: 1.Cost much more than GP lanes 2.Ensure congestion instead of relieving it 3.Eliminates or at least limits our ability to make future I-77 improvements 4.Locks us into an agreement with a private company for 50 years 5.Will negatively impact our economy
28
I-77 HOT Lanes An Expensive, Non-Solution That Limits Future I-77 Improvements and Negatively Impacts Our Economy Wideni77.org wideni77@hotmail.com
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.