1. Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio

2. Key Issues  UTSA’s role of providing accessible quality educational programs is critical to the future of South Texas.  Level of state resources for both operations and buildings primarily drive the level of student fees.  Growth related faculty and infrastructure needs create further upward pressure on fees.

3. State Appropriations$ 84,416,528 Tuition and Fees$ 71,648,125 Gifts & Grants$ 40,678,491 Other$ 13,572,279 Total$210,315,423 State Appropriations$ 84,416,528 Tuition and Fees$ 71,648,125 Gifts & Grants$ 40,678,491 Other$ 13,572,279 Total$210,315,423 FY 2002-03 Budget

4. State Appropriations$ 80,220,143 Tuition and Fees$ 93,814,749 Gifts & Grants$ 50,991,072 Other$ 15,879,208 Total$240,905,172 State Appropriations$ 80,220,143 Tuition and Fees$ 93,814,749 Gifts & Grants$ 50,991,072 Other$ 15,879,208 Total$240,905,172 FY 2003-04 Budget

5. Percentage of the Texas State Budget that Goes to Higher Education 18.0% 13.7% 1984-852002-03

6. Tight State Funding In 2001 UTSA ranked 29 th out of 38 state institutions in appropriations per student FTE. In 2001 UTSA ranked 29 th out of 38 state institutions in appropriations per student FTE. If UTSA received the median amount for all institutions, UTSA would receive almost $15 million more from the formula. If UTSA received the median amount for all institutions, UTSA would receive almost $15 million more from the formula.

7. Tight State Funding  Formula uses BASE YEAR approach thereby under funding growth.  Teaching supplement should be amended for emerging institutions.  Plant formula does not provide sufficient funds to cover current costs.  Increase in energy costs is not adequately addressed in the funding formula.

8. Infrastructure Facts  UTSA is one of the state’s fastest growing public universities.  UTSA has and will continue to have a significant space deficiency.  UTSA has the highest classroom utilization in Texas.  UTSA has one of the highest faculty workloads in Texas.

9. Projected Enrollment by Level TOTAL25,00026,32227,64434,25340,862

10. Projected Space Deficiency Compared with Coordinating Board Standard 59%68%74%60%50%

11. Space Utilization Fall 2002 THECB Rank Institution Fall 2002 Number of Classrooms Fall 2002 Average Weekly Hours Used 1 UT San Antonio 10249.2 10 UT Austin 43039.6 THECB Std 38.0 18 UT Arlington 18632.9 20 UT El Paso 13932.6 27 UT Dallas 12227.2

12. Student/Faculty Workloads Student/Faculty Workloads INSTITUTION1998199920002001 UTSA23.823.623.822.7 UT Arlington 16.917.217.918.5 UT Austin 17.818.418.918.8 UT Dallas 17.017.918.821.0 UT El Paso 17.717.917.817.9 All Texas Public Institutions 17.917917.817.9

13. Growth Impact on Budget (FY 2004 & FY2005)  $11.3 million need for tenure track faculty.  $ 8.9 million need for deferred maintenance and adaptive renovations.  $ 3.6 million need for lease payments  $ 2.1 million need for maintenance and utilities including the cost of new facilities.

14. Tuition Designated

15. Budget Distribution