Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team."— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team

2 Activity I: Choose the Study Topic The study topic should:  Be selected following collection and analysis of data- if the MCO is a new plan and has no historical or plan- specific data, the documentation in Activity I should reflect this. The MCO should provide its effective enrollment date and the rationale for not having data.  Have the potential to affect member health, outcomes of care, functional status, or satisfaction. The MCO should be documenting the link between the study topic and outcomes of care.

3 Activity II: State the Study Question The study question should:  State the problem to be studied in simple terms and be in the recommended X/Y format “ Does doing X result in Y?”

4 The study population should:  Be accurately and completely defined and capture all members to whom the study question applies  Include all applicable codes that identify members for the population (denominator) Activity III: Identify the Study Population

5 Activity IV: Select the Study Indicator The study indicator(s) should:  Be well-defined, objective, and measures changes in health or functional status, consumer satisfaction, or valid process alternatives  Allow for the study question to be answered (the study question and study indicator should be in alignment)  Include the title of the study indicator(s) in the gray shaded box  Include remeasurement goals. The goals should be documented as percentages

6  If sampling was used (most HEDIS-based PIPs), the MCO should complete the table in Activity V  If sampling was not used (most administrative data- based PIPs), the MCO should state that sampling was not used Activity V: Use Valid Sampling Techniques

7 Data Collection  The step-by-step process that leads to the production of the study indicator(s) rates should be documented  The MCO should include a copy of the manual data collection tool, if applicable  When surveys are used to collect data, the MCO should include a copy of the survey, CATI script if applicable, and cover letter that accompanies the survey  The data analysis plan should be documented (how rates are calculated, how rates will be compared to the goal, and what statistical test will be used Activity VI: Define Data Collection

8 Data Analysis  The MCOs should complete the data table for all PIPs that have progressed to the point of reporting data  For HEDIS-based PIPs, the rates reported in the PIP should match the MCOs rates reported to AHCA  The rates in the data table should be reported accurately (numerator divided by the denominator)  The measurement periods documented in Activity VII should match those documented in Activity IV Activity VII: Analyze Data and Interpret Study Results

9 Activity VIII: Implementing Interventions and Improvement Strategies Improvement strategies should:  Be related to causes/barriers identified through data analysis and quality improvement processes- the MCOs should be describing what quality improvement tools were used to identify barriers  Be revised if there was a decline in performance  The MCOs should be documenting the process used to evaluate the effectiveness of its interventions  The interventions should align with the barriers and directly impact the study indicator(s )

10 Disparity PIP TIPs  Disparity PIPs must have two study indicators  The MCO must have identified a statistically significant difference between two entities (i.e., race/ethnicities, age groups) for there to be a true disparity. This information should be documented in Activity I  The focus of the PIP should be to increase the rates for the two study indicators and to eliminate the disparity  The study question should be structured to reflect an increase in both rates and eliminate the disparity

11 Tips for Retiring PIPs  Before a PIP can be considered for retirement, the PIP should include at least baseline and two remeasurement periods of data  The study indicator(s) have achieved statistically significant improvement over the baseline and sustained the improvement  If a PIP has been in progress for greater than five years and all ten activities have been completed- consider the PIP for retirement. If rates are suboptimal, the MCO can continue its efforts for improvement internally

12  For HEDIS-based PIPs, the MCOs should provide the HEDIS technical specifications annually  Data collection tools and surveys should be submitted on an annual basis  Verify that the survey question listed in the PIP matches the question in the survey  Review submitted Fishbone and/or cause and effect diagrams annually to ensure that they have been updated  Use the Interactive Data Submission System (IDSS) document to verify reported HEDIS rates General PIP Tips

13 Questions and Answers


Download ppt "Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google