Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMorgan Day Modified over 9 years ago
1
TERCO – an outline of results Grzegorz Gorzelak Open Days University, Brussels 10.10.2012
2
Scope of research, research questions
3
INTERREG IIIC & IVC lead partnersall partners
4
INTERREG IIIB & IVB lead partnersall partners
5
Twinning Cities Analysed co-operation among twinning cities as one type of territorial co- operation Created unique pan-European database on twinning city networking from internet sources (Wikipedia - city web sites) Carried out Network Analyses of intensity and degree of twining city cooperation Carried out Case Studies to find out: – substance behind city-twinning co- operation –importance of twinning co-operation for development, international flows –determinants/drivers of city twinning co-operation –Future desired domains for city- twinning co-operation
6
City twinning – number of agreements
7
City twinning USA Canada
8
City twinning Russia Ukraine
9
City twinning Central and South America China
10
Governance models
11
Research results The best TC projects seem to be those which focus on solving a specific problem together and time of simple projects is coming to an end. Introduction of more functional approach to territory seems to be important for future TC. In case of TC across external borders cultural cooperation and education are perceived by actors from all sectors as the most important domains. TC programmes should neither be designed nor analysed in isolation from other strategies/programmes at a given (sub)region. External policies do matter. Co-ordination matters if we think seriously about synergies. Governance models: a) depend on the specific situation, b) top- down approaches are unlikely to work when partners contribute large financial shares to the project.
12
Research results II Good practices: their number increases with the growing complexity of projects, (e.g. common database with compitibile procedures, regular stakeholder forums, common involvement in certification for quality labels, etc.) Infrastructural investments: –a) YES if have EU dimension, (e.g. missing link in transport network), –b) New MS - physical infrastructure; Old MS - social infrastructure, –c) in short run small infrastructural project - long run importance of soft measures. Promising prospects for the future
13
Gains from Territorial Cooperation
14
Thank you for your attention
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.