Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Jamie Nagle University of Colorado at Boulder RHIC & AGS User’s Reception APS Meeting,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Jamie Nagle University of Colorado at Boulder RHIC & AGS User’s Reception APS Meeting,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Jamie Nagle University of Colorado at Boulder RHIC & AGS User’s Reception APS Meeting, Denver, Colorado

2 Quark Gluon Plasma Lattice QCD predicts a phase transition to a Quark Gluon Plasma at high temperature where the number of degrees of freedom is significantly increased. Phase Transition: T = 170 MeV ~ 10 12 0 F  = 0.8 GeV/fm 3 Assumes thermal system. T/T c hadrons  quark/gluon  /T 4 Expect a “weakly” interacting gas of quarks and gluons where the long range confining potential is screened. Non-Interacting Gas Limit Is this really what we expect?

3 Definition of QGP on the Lattice QCD in Vacuum linear increase in potential with distance from color charge strong attractive force spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry confinement of quarks to hadrons baryons (qqq) and mesons (qq) QCD in dense and hot matter screening of color charges potential vanishes for large distance scales restoration of approximate chiral symmetry as quarks act as nearly massless particles deconfinement of quarks ! r  V(r)/  Lattice QCD calculation

4 Heavy Ion Collisions 10,000 gluons, quarks, and antiquarks from the nuclear wavefunctions are made physical in the laboratory ! What is the nature of this ensemble of partons?

5

6 Where Are We? Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider online since 2000. Design Au+Au energy and luminosity achieved. All experiments successfully taking data STAR RHIC is kicking butt !And Even More So !

7 Experimental Observations As an experimentalist, let the data speak for itself. At least as much as possible.

8 Perturbative QCD and Factorization Proton+Proton   0 + X NLO pQCD calculation agrees with data from 2-13 GeV Extend to nuclei by expected scaling with nuclear thickness calculated as a function of impact parameter PDF pQCD D(z)

9 What About Heavy Ion Reactions? Peripheral Au+Au = superposition of p+p reactions. Central Au+Au reveals a significant suppression ! d + Au Control Experiment Preliminary Data Au + Au Experimentd + Au Control PeripheralCentral

10 Jet Correlations away-sidenear-side Complete jet reconstruction is not available We study back to back jets via angular correlations J t =615±60 sys MeV/c k t =2.3±0.4± GeV/c J t =636±20 MeV/c k t =1.7±0.1 GeV/c 0.67 1.11  STAR hadron parton

11 “Disappearance” of Away-Side Jet 1/N trigger dN/d(  ) In central Au+Au reactions, the away-side jet disappears (blue points) No correlation for particles with p T > 2 GeV away sidenear side Conservation of energy and momentum says that away side jet cannot really disappear

12 Where is the Energy? High p T trigger hadron selects surface emission. Thus, away-side partner has maximum path through the medium.

13 Opaque Medium Perhaps partons lose energy in medium, and thus fragmentation products are below p T > 2 GeV. Perhaps scattering causes broadening of angular distribution. Jets Eaten by Black Hole Created at RHIC! Black Hole Formation

14 Thermalization of Energy !  Au+Au 0-5% p T > 200 MeV STAR Preliminary PHENIX Away side jet is significantly broadened One recovers energy in hadrons ~ 500 MeV. Not so different from of the bulk medium. 1/N trigger dN/d(  )

15 Direct Photons Shine Use measured  0  , and look for photon excess Excess agrees with NLO pQCD direct photons scaled by nuclear thickness Direct photons unaffected by medium as expected pTpT

16 Charm and Beauty QCD is flavor independent, but heavy quarks at same p T are moving much slower than light quarks. Expected “dead-cone” with no induced gluon radiation. Recent single lepton and direct D reconstruction allow us to address this physics. c D±D±

17 Jet Quenching Baier, Dokshitzer, Mueller, Schiff, hep-ph/9907267 Gyulassy, Levai, Vitev, hep-pl/9907461 Wang, nucl-th/9812021 and many more….. Partons are expected to lose energy via induced gluon radiation in traversing a dense colored medium. Coherence among these radiated gluons leads to  E  L 2 Effective softening of fragmentation function.

18 Data and Theory Collide Au-Au d-Au dAu Induced gluon brehmstrahlung pQCD calculation Agrees with data with initial gluon density: dN g /dy ~ 1100  > 100  0 Lowest energy radiation sensitive to infrared cutoff. * Note deuteron-gold control experiment with no suppression

19 Collective Motion In non central collisions, large initial spatial anisotropy The degree to which this translated into momentum space is an excellent measure of the pressure PHOBOS

20 Large Pressure Felt By All Hadrons Very large rescattering, more than most predicted Multi-strange baryons flow, and maybe charm too ! PHENIX preliminary

21 Hydrodynamics Assume early equilibration, and initial energy density from gluon radiation calculations Equations of Motion Equation of State from lattice QCD

22 Data and Theory Collide (II) Agreement between hydrodynamics at mid-rapidity for hadron spectra and elliptic flow (v 2 ) up to p T ~ 2 GeV Hydrodynamics without any viscosity describes heavy ion reactions at low p T

23 Some Puzzles? More (anti) baryons than pions at moderate p T. Does not look like vacuum jet fragmentation. Proton-Proton Central Au-Au Factorization assumption of jet fragmentation completely breaks down. Color recombination ?

24 Some Puzzles? Hydrodynamic models have trouble describing longitudinal motion Many assume boost-invariance (plateau in rapidity) Particle correlations indicate shorter lifetime BRAHMS

25 Quark-Gluon Plasma? Many indications of energy density well above phase transition value. However, it does not look anything like a “weakly” interacting gas of quarks and gluons. More like a liquid with zero viscosity. New quasi-particles or couplings? Help needed from lattice, effective theory, string theory

26 Something Provacative! “It’s a Quark-Gluon Plasma. Period.” “But, What Have You Learnt?” “A witty saying proves nothing.” Voltaire

27 Something Provacative (2) There is too much repeating of the mantra in this field without additional thinking. It does not mean the mantra is always false. In this case (QGP), it may well be true. However only by being skeptical and pointing out disagreements can one make scientific progress. Repeat after me..... Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

28 Something Provacative (3) 1.“Everyone” says hydrodynamics works for the first time at RHIC. Is that really true? Look at CERES v 2 versus p T ? Upcoming low energy RHIC data will be very interesting? 2.“Everyone” says QGP Equation of State is consistent via hydrodynamics with RHIC data. Is this a unique conclusion? How sensitive is it to the EOS? Usually added 1 st order transition lengthens the lifetime, and thus more HBT disagreement? 3. “Everyone” says parton energy loss explains jet quenching. How do we reconcile the HERMES species depedent modification? Does radiation significantly broaden jets? Does this create a conflict with observed particle multiplicity?

29 4. “Everyone” says the color glass condensate is universal form of matter? But is the physics at HERA and RHIC dominated by this universal behaviour or non-universal calculation details? A revolution involves at least the following: Revolutions involve major realignments of traditional relationships between large groups of people. Friends try to kill one another. Sometimes successfully. There are bad consequences if you try to make a revolution and fail. L. McLerran, hep-ph/0402137

30 Nuclear Structure Function Physics x Saturation? shadowing enhancement EMC effect Fermi Effect Color Glass Condensate Proton-Nucleus and Deuteron-Nucleus reactions at RHIC are addressing critical physics of saturation and the Color Glass Condensate. Collider allows one to probe both forward and backward x F ranges. Also, complementary gluon saturation physics to HERA. Possible future electron-ion collider at RHIC. Hadrons probing x ~ 10 -3 -10 -4 J/  probing nuclei x ~ 10 -3

31 Spin Program Underway STAR – PRL 92, 171801 (2004)PHENIX hep-ex/0404027

32 Where Are We Going? RHIC has passed the first key test. Nuclear Physics community is capable of constructing and running world class “high-energy” type experiments and re-constructing the physics from the 10,000 particle debris. The second phase has arrived. First observations of very dense gluonic medium with strong pressure built up. Gluon density well above lattice predicted phase transition level and behaving as zero viscosity opaque liquid. The third phase is next. Quarkonia measurements to test deconfinment. Low mass vector mesons for parton correlations in plasma. Large Hadron Collider heavy ion program will add many complementary studies.

33 Where are We Going? Focus on where calculations work and where they do not work! Lots of interesting physics already learned and even more so in the future. Continue to expect more surprises!


Download ppt "Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Jamie Nagle University of Colorado at Boulder RHIC & AGS User’s Reception APS Meeting,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google