Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDarren McCarthy Modified over 8 years ago
1
Instructor: Chris Bemis Random Matrix in Finance Understanding and improving Optimal Portfolios Mantao Wang, Ruixin Yang, Yingjie Ma, Yuxiang Zhou, Wei Shao, Zhengwei Liu
2
Purpose and Phenomenon of Project Finding optimal weights Covariance matrix Marchenko-Pustur to fit data PCA reconstruction The impact of near-zero eigenvalues in mean-variance optimization
3
1 23 Data 300 stocks 546 weeks Analysis σ, λ, Q Reconstruction Optimize mean variance
4
1 Data Bouchard’s idea Marchenko-Pustur Law
5
Analysis Eigenvalue Decomposition of Fully Allocated MVO
6
Data Selection 300 stocks Х 546 weeks Criterion: Return history over 10 years of weekly data Biggest market capitalization
7
Data Filtered Variance-Covariance Matrix
8
Data Selection 300 stocks Х 546 weeks Why some of eigenvalues close to 0? Some original return data are extremely small Random effect Collinearity among 300 stocks The impact of near-zero eigenvalues in MVO
9
2 Analysis of Results Empirical distribution of eigenvalues Marchenko-Pustur Law Analysis
10
Correlation Matrix Best Fit M-P Distribution Filter Noisy Data Goals: To eliminate the random noise in the covariance matrix Analysis Procedures
11
Procedure 1 2 3 4 Correlation Matrix Distribution of Eigenvalues Best Fit M-P Distribution Filter Noisy Data Analysis Procedures
12
Analysis Ideas Random & Not Random Marchenko-Pastur Law
13
Analysis Ideas
14
Analysis Minimization
15
Analysis Minimization
16
Fitting result
17
Analysis
18
Analysis of largest λ The largest eigenvalue λ=118.3564
19
Analysis Total variance explained by noise
20
3 Reconstruction Filtered Variance-Covariance Matrix An Example of Mean-Variance Optimization
21
Reconstruction Theory
22
Reconstruction Theory
23
Analysis Filtered Variance-Covariance Matrix
24
Reconstruction Calculated Filtered Optimal Weight
25
Reconstruction Calculated Filtered Optimal Weight
26
Weight from filtered Sample Less volatility Lower concentration No extreme shorting Weight from Sample Bigger volatility Higher concentration Extreme shorting Reconstruction Comparison the weight
27
Reconstruction Sample Weight and Filtered Weight Comparison
28
Reconstruction Sample Weight and Filtered Weight Comparison Expected Return from Sample Covariance Matrix is
29
Reconstruction Cumulative Value of Filtered Portfolio and Sample Portfolio Per Month
30
Reconstruction Cumulative Value of Filtered Portfolio and S&P 500 Per Month
31
Questions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.