1. LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING October 30, 2013

2. Bell Ringer Choose four formative assessment practices that research reviews suggest lead to improved student achievement.

3. Clear Learning Goal Use formative assessment to differentiate teaching and learning Develop deeper knowledge of questioning and engagement

4. Clear Learning Goals Demonstrate the fundamentals of free throw shooting to successfully hit a shot

5. Free Throw Shooting

6. Directions Write down the fundamental steps needed to successfully hit free throws

7. Free Throw Shooting

8. Steps Feet shoulder width apart Determine your ritual Reach for the rim, inside the rim or back of the rim Balance the ball on your fingertips Arms in L shape Follow the motion through the body Follow through

9. With a shoulder partner physically practice steps to fundamentally shoot free throws correctly

10. Formative Assessment Feet shoulder width apart Determine your ritual Reach for the rim, inside the rim or back of the rim Balance the ball on your fingertips Arms in L shape Follow the motion through the body Follow through

11. GO TO THE GYM

12. Assessment Results ___________ out of ___________ made their first free throw attempt ___________ out of ___________ made their second free throw attempt ___________ out of ___________ made their summative free throw attempt

13. Next Steps Do we move on? What about students that have mastered the skill or the ones who need much remediation? Did our formative assessment align with our Clear Learning Goal & what we taught? Did we put you in the game situation?

14. Next Steps cont’ Did we have mastery of the formative before we did the summative? Did we get the problem fixed so could have growth? Did we individualize or regroup?

15. How did you organize the cards? Reflecting on this list, which skills are not applicable in science education?

16. Do Categories Matter? English Language Arts Science and Engineering Mathematics Cite textual evidence to support analysis Determine the meaning of symbols and domain specific words Follow precisely a multi-step procedure Distinguish among facts, reasoned judgment in research, and speculation Analyze the structure used for organization and to enhance understanding Integrate information expressed in words with visual representations Compare/Contrast experimental results with informational text Ask Questions and Define Problems Develop and Use Models Plan and Carry Out Investigations Analyze and Interpret Data Use Math, Information Technology, Computer Technology, and Computational Thinking Construct Explanations and Design Solutions Engage in Argument from Evidence Obtain, Evaluate, and Communicate Information Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them Reason abstractly and quantitatively Construct viable arguments & critique reasoning of others Model with mathematics Use appropriate tools strategically Attend to precision Look for and make use of structure Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

17. Program Review (PR) Scoring Guide

18. Program Review Calculations Each of the 3 Program Review areas (Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living) is comprised of 4 standards (Curriculum/Instruction, Formative/Summative Assessment, Professional Development, and Administrative Support). Step 1: Average the characteristic scores for a score for each standard. –Scores range from 0-3 for each standard –0 – No Implementation, 1– Needs Improvement, 2 –Proficient, and 3 Distinguished Step 2: Add the 4 standard scores to get a single number for each Program Review area. –Scores range 0-12 for each Program Review area –The cut score 8 is Proficient and 10.8 is Distinguished Step 3: Add the three Program Review area scores for a total Program Review score. –Scores range between 0-36 Step 4: Divide the total number by 24 (proficient (8) x 3 areas = 24). –This number yields the percent of the 23 points earned (number of points possible in Unbridled Learning accountability model for PR when Learners and PR are combined).

19. Program Review Data Release AVERAGE CHARACTER- ISTIC SCORES PROGRAM REVIEW TOTAL CATEGORY ARTS & HUMANITIES Curriculum/ Instruction 1.0 Formative/ Summative Assessment 1.0 Professional Development 1.0 Administrative Support 1.0 ARTS & HUMANITIES TOTAL 4 Needs Improvement PRACTICAL LIVING/CAREER STUDIES Curriculum/Instruction 2.0 Formative/Summative Assessment 2.0 Professional Development 1.9 Administrative Support 2.1 PRACTICAL LIVING TOTAL 8 Proficient WRITING Curriculum/Instruction 1.4 Formative/Summative Assessment 1.4 Professional Development 1.8 Administrative Support 1.4 WRITING TOTAL 6 Needs Improvement TOTAL POINTS18 PERCENTAGE OF POINTS (divide by 24)75% ACCOUNTABILITY POINTS (out of 23 points possible)17.25 Calculation Example

20. Accountability Formula for Combining Next Generation Learners and Program Reviews ComponentOverall Weighted Percent Weighted Score Next Gen Learners Overall Score 57.9X77%=44.6 Program Reviews75.0X23%=17.3 Combined Overall Score* 61.9 *Combined Overall Score used to calculate new 70 th and 90 th percentile cut for summer 2014 targets

21. Exit Slip Reflect on conversations around formative and summative assessments. What adjustments do you need to implement to develop enduring skills in students?