Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRudolph Simon Modified over 9 years ago
1
Isospin Mixing And In-beam Study Of 56 Co Non-yrast States At MLL/Miniball. Motivation And First Glance On The Results Of The Experiment Ana Montaner Pizá. Instituto de Física Corpuscular IFIC, Valencia, Spain. MINIBALL Workshop. 24-25 October 2013. CERN, Geneva.
2
Physics motivations Starting point: Comparison of beta decay of 56 Zn with its mirror process 56 Fe( 3 He,t) 56 Co. Motivations: 1. Study of the γ de-excitation of the IAS in 56 Co. 2. Clarification of the J π assignment of two key levels in 56 Co. At RCNP (Osaka, Japan) At GANIL (France) 1
3
56 Co present knowledge Present status of the 56 Co nucleus from ENSDF Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data FileENSDF Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File 3076.0 keV, 1 + ? 2635.9 keV, 1 + ? Isospin mixed states 2
4
Studying the mirror process: Beta decay experiment at GANIL The beta decay experiment was carried out at GANIL in 2010, focused on the production of 56 Zn. (S. Orrigo, B. Rubio, Y. Fujita, W. Gelletly et. al.) The analysis of this experiment is very advanced. In order to fully interpret this work a better understanding of the 56 Co excited states will be crucial. 56 Zn → 56 Cu + β + 56 Z n 4 EXOGAM clovers for gamma detection 4 EXOGAM clovers for gamma detection 4 EXOGAM clovers for gamma detection 3
5
Motivation I: Study of the γ de-excitation of the IAS in 56 Co Isospin mixed states Reference: S.E.A. Orrigo et al., INPC 2013 Proceedings, EPJ Web of Conferences (2013). 4 Very low S p Proton decay for the IAS is isospin forbidden gamma de-excitation is possible. IAS
6
Motivation II: Clarification of the J π assignment of two key levels in 56 Co (1) Reference: "Isospin mixing for the isobaric analog state studied in a high-resolution 56 Fe(3He,t) 56 Co reaction". H. Fujita, Y. Fujita et al., submitted to PRC. 5
7
Motivation II: Clarification of the J π assignment of two levels in 56 Co (2) Well known 1 + distribution 3.076 MeV 2.633 MeV 2 + distribution Reference: "Isospin mixing for the isobaric analog state studied in a high-resolution 56 Fe(3He,t) 56 Co reaction". H. Fujita, Y. Fujita et al., submitted to PRC. 6
8
MINIBALL experiment at the MLL (Munich) Experiment carried out in the Maier-Leibnitz-Laboratorium (MLL) at the Technische Universität München (TUM), in June 2013. Reaction: 56 Fe(p,n) 56 Co 56 Fe Target thicknesses: 1 and 2 mg/cm 2 Proton beam: 10 MeV and 12 MeV Beam intensity: 1-3 nA Duration: 6 day Angle calibration reaction: 32 S(d,p) 33 S in inverse kinematics. 7
9
Setup of the experiment Beam direction MINIBALL clusters MINIBALL cluster 8
10
Preliminary results of MINIBALL experiment at MLL 962 keV 891 keV ? 962 891 869 796 18781806 Isospin mixed states T=1 0 + T=2 0 + IAS Either not there or much weaker, and we will get upper limits in due time 1185 Study of the γ de-excitation of the IAS in 56 Co. Gated in the 1185 keV line 9
11
Preliminary results of MINIBALL experiment at MLL (2) 1185 keV peak from the de-excitation of the 2635 keV level: # Counts: 1.12·10 5 # Counts per measurable angle: 1.12·10 5 /(4x3x6) ≈ 1555 Clarification of the J π of the levels 3076 keV and 2636 keV in 56 Co using angular correlations. 1185 keV peak 962 891 869 796 18781806 Isospin mixed states T=1 0 + T=2 0 + IAS 1185 2635.9 keV 480 Miniball: 4 clusters 3 crystal/cluster 6 segments/crystal Gated in the 480 keV line 10
12
Conclusions Stability and well behaviour of MINIBALL detectors. Crosstalk problem. We have to restrict to coincidences between different Clusters. From the motivation point of view: Angular correlations: we will be able to clarify the spin-assignment of the 2636 keV and 3076 keV states. Gamma de-excitation of the two 0 + isospin mixed states We should be able to set meaningful upper limits to those "new" two gamma lines from the de- excitation of the 0 + T=1 state. 11
13
A. Montaner-Pizá, B. Rubio, J. Agramunt, A. Algora, V. Guadilla, S. Orrigo. IFIC-Valencia, Spain. D. Mücher, S. Reichert, S. Hellgartner, C. Berner. TUM, Munich, Germany. B. Gelletly. Surrey University, U.K. Y. Fujita. RCNP, Osaka, Japan. E. Ganioglu, Istanbul University, Turkey. Thank you! 12
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.