1. Reading Faculty (Full-Time vs. Adjunct)  Dorothy Scully retired Spring 2013 (replacement position)  Janelle Gray retired Spring 2014 (replacement position/growth position)  Sarah Hawes hired Spring 2014 (to replace Dorothy Scully)  John Clanton hired Spring 2015 (separation date December 2015)

2. Reading Faculty (Full-Time vs. Adjunct)  No Replacement Position

3. Average Beginning Fill Rates (Reading 40, 82, 184 and Spelling 32)  12% Higher Than College-Wide Average Enrollment Trends Reading/Spelling2011-20122012-20132013-20142014-2015 Beginning Fill Rate131%123%119%117% Census Fill Rate112%106%103%102% Retention Rate81%85%86%85% Success Rate65%71%72%71% COLLEGE2011-20122012-20132013-20142014-2015 Beginning Fill Rate112%111%104%100% Census Fill Rate99%97%90%86% Retention Rate80%82% 78% Success Rate62%65% 62% Source: 2015 Program Review

4. Census Fill Rate (2012-2015)  12% Higher Than College-Wide Average Source: Program Review 2015

5. Reading Retention Rates (2012-2015)  5% Higher Than College-Wide Average Source: Program Review 2015

6. Reading Success Rate (2012-2015)  10% Higher Than College-Wide Average Source: Program Review 2015

7. Bottlenecks  Waitlists in Reading 40 are partly the result of the English 49/Reading 40 co-requisite.  Many of the waitlisted students who are unable to enroll in Reading 40 must then drop (or are unable to add) English 49.

8. Bottlenecks  The number of English 49 sections continues to grow, which requires concurrent growth in the number of Reading 40 sections.

9. Reading Classes Serve Non-Traditional Students  Reading courses function as a logical transition between the ESL sequence and the English sequence, and the Reading Department continues to serve a high number of ESL students.  The Reading Department receives many of its students from Student Services programs such as EOP&S, CalWorks, CARE, and Disability Services as Reading 40 continues to serve as a point-of-entry for many non-traditional students.

10. Reading Courses Contribute to Student Success  In 2012, the success rate for English 50 students who had taken Reading 40 was 16% higher than the general student population.  75% pass rate vs 63% pass rate