Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byShavonne Paula Wilson Modified over 9 years ago
1
{ Mapping & Analysis of Wastewater Spills in the Barton Springs and Southern Segments of the Edwards Aquifer Project manager: Katie Tritsch Asst. PM/Webdeveloper: Eric Schroeder GIS Analyst: Katie Steele GIS Analyst: Kevin Taylor Presented for: Greater Edwards Aquifer Alliance (GEAA)
2
{ BackgroundScope Literature Review DataMethodologyResultsConclusion Overview
3
{ Edwards Aquifer as an important resource Wastewater spill pollution from centralized sewage systems Increasing public awareness Increasing strength of regulations Background
4
Scope Hays, Travis, Williamson Counties RZ & CZ TCEQ spill records, 500 gallons or more 2007-2012
5
Literature Review Wastewater spills in TCEQ Region 13 Predominately data collection Limited analysis of spatial or temporal correlation – context Successful press conference
6
Data collected Wastewater spill records TCEQ Roads TSDC Streams TWDB County boundaries CAPCOG City limits CAPCOG Census Tracts CAPCOG Edwards Aquifer zones TCEQ & TWDB
7
TCEQ raw data put into separate columns 640 spill records processed, only 534 mapped Data Processing Table 1. Data received and data mapped County Spill records received Spill records mapped Data loss (%) Hays1139218.6 Travis42234518.2 Williamson105959.5
8
Methodology 1.Geocoding – Location and volume of spill 2.Interactive mapping w/ Manifold 3.Qualitative analysis – Why are these spill happening? Original hypothesis of MUDs and GCDs refuted Causes of spills ‘Vulnerability’ of populations (Pop density + Spill density)
9
{ Maps & stats Results
11
TAKE AWAY… 534 spills mapped Over 12 million gallons of wastewater spilled in 5 years A little over 17% were in RZ
19
Manifold
20
Conclusion Significant data loss due to lack of spatial information Tighter regulation necessary? Spills cannot be tied to outlying MUDs, but rather developing cities Most spills in Austin, infrastructure repair may be necessary Main cause of wastewater spills is line blockage, 2 nd is damaged pipes Preventative methods Lack of temporal pattern; frequency of spills throughout each year don’t significantly increase/decrease Combined, 31% of spills occurred in both RZ & CZ (166 total) Hope to aid in GEAA’s mission of improving aquifer health and expand public awareness with the addition of our data to GeoTex and future projects
21
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.