Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mapsec Performance Management in Sweden Allan Gustafsson Seoul, March 18, 2004.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mapsec Performance Management in Sweden Allan Gustafsson Seoul, March 18, 2004."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mapsec Performance Management in Sweden Allan Gustafsson Seoul, March 18, 2004

2 Mapsec Features of Swedish government   50 % redistribution  Local government dominates government consumption 20 out 28 %  Small Ministries – numerous and independent agencies Only 2 % of all government employees in the Cabinet Offices

3 Mapsec Objective of PM  Effectiveness (Do the right thing)  Efficiency (Do things right)

4 Mapsec Ambit  Political culture, media  Parliamentary process  Interaction legislature – Government  External audit, research institutions  Internal processes in Cabinet Offices  Interaction Cabinet Offices – agencies  Internal processes in agencies  Interaction agencies – public

5 Mapsec Basic tenet regarding efficiency  Authority + accountability  efficiency

6 Mapsec Authority  Block appropriations  Carry-over & credit facilities  Authority over payments  Personnel  Premises  Own revenue  Accounting

7 Mapsec Accountability & responsibility Vis-à-vis government  Agency ordinance (general)  Agency specific instructions  Letter of appropriation Objectives and results indicators Ad hoc reporting requirements Finances  Statement of accounts and yearly report  Follow-up meeting with responsible minister  External audits  Evaluation of financial management

8 Mapsec Accountability & responsibility Vis-à-vis the public  Consumer choice  The Parliamentary Ombudsman  The media

9 Mapsec Effectiveness Not integral part of budget process  Committees  Cabinet Office working groups  Research institutes  Performance evaluations  Three-year proposals (abandoned)

10 Mapsec Accountability & responsibility Vis-à-vis the elected bodies  Agency statements of accounts and yearly report  Consolidated Government annual accounts

11 Mapsec Implementation  Drawn-out, piecemeal  Different champions  Initiatives from below  Inertia  Resistance

12 Mapsec Results  Greater efficiency – yes!  Greater effectiveness – ?

13 Mapsec Difficulties and issues  Willingness and capacity to reassess  Program structure  Definition and agreement on objectives and indicators  Financial and results reporting  Budget ≠ accounts  Monitoring and evaluation capacity  Integration into political process  Cross-institutional coordination and decision- making

14 Mapsec Performance budgeting

15 Mapsec Programmatic structure Objective Budget Outcome Cost Policy area Minstry AMinstry B Programme Sub-programme Strategy Objective Budget Outcome Cost Objective Budget Outcome Cost Objective Budget Output Cost Objective Budget Output Cost Objective Budget Output Cost


Download ppt "Mapsec Performance Management in Sweden Allan Gustafsson Seoul, March 18, 2004."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google