Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMoris Austin Modified over 9 years ago
1
Sergio Jaramillo Uribe Geno R. Pawlak University of Hawaii AUV-Based Observations of Rough Bed Hydrodynamics
2
Reefs: Highly irregular/ rough bathymetry Turbulent processes affect: Waves/currents Sediment transport Nutrient dispersal Acoustics/optics The problem: Roughness scales How to relate hydrodynamic and physical roughness in reefs? Models assume homogeneous roughness. Need to measure spatial scales of roughness over a reef Roughness Spectra Nunes & Pawlak 2008: Vessel, diver surveys of bed roughness at Kilo Nalu
3
Objectives: Study area: Kilo Nalu Nearshore Reef Observatory, Oahu, Hawaii. REMUS AUV surveys 5 - 40m depth, 1 x 0.5km Sidescan: spatial context / bed classification Narrow beam altimeter: physical roughness Relate bottom type/roughness to currents Can we use DVLs to measure currents?
4
Instruments: Sidescan sonar (Marine Sonic Technology): 900 kHz, 6x12cm resolution Narrow beam altimeter (Imagenex): 2.5 degree beam spread, ~10cm res. DVLs (RD Instruments): 1.2MHz, 1m bins, 1Hz sampling rate REMUS (Remote Environmental Monitoring UnitS, Hydroid, Inc) Sidescan transducer CTD ADCP array Trim weights Altimeter LBL transducer Altimeter GPS antenna
5
Convert to geo coords Statistics (6x6m boxes) EOF Relate to Roughness AUV Sidescan Analysis
6
EOF variables: variance skewness entropy spectral slope anisotropy AUV Sidescan Analysis
7
Variance Skewness Spectral Slope Anisotropy + Entropy …
8
AUV Sidescan Analysis R 2 = 0.61 EOF 1: 53%
9
AUV Sidescan Analysis EOF modes 2 (18%), 3 (17%): anisotropy + spectral slope Sand ripples EOF Mode 2
10
Ship/AUV based current measurements: (Fong & Monismith, 2004, Dereck & Fong, 2006) Known bias in vehicle's direction Need to assess data quality: Characterize bias Compare to fixed ADCPs
11
Velocity bias 5m 6m 7m 8m 9m 2.0m/s 2.5m/s 1.5m/s AUV speed + shoreward legs o seaward legs Should be closer (6min difference)
12
Bias velocity vs: Ambiguity velocity and Vehicle speed AUV speed 2.5m/s 2.0m/s 1.5m/s Should be close to zero Best result for our tests: AUV speed ~= Va = 2.5m/s
13
Bias mean profiles (6min difference) Along-track velocity Ringing Low SNR? Along-track bias ~1% of AUV speed => Navigation OK Currents NOT OK
14
DVL along-shore current profiles: NO bias observed KN2 Current vertical structure OK
15
Summary - Bottom classification: Sidescan EOFs separate sand, coral, rippled areas - Roughness measurements: Sand areas RMS < 3cm, Coral reef 8-14cm RMS - Velocity bias and DVL settings: Bias velocity (only along-track) ~ 1% of AUV speed Sensitive to ambiguity velocity setting Possible ringing + SNR decay with distance - Current profiles:Good agreement with fixed ADCP DVLs can resolve current vertical structure - Ongoing: Relate roughness/seabed type to currents More observations
17
Visual verification
18
Sand with ripples Coral
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.