Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVanessa Joseph Modified over 9 years ago
1
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma1 B Decays to Measure Stephen Bailey Harvard University for the BaBar Collaboration PASCOS 2003 Mumbai, India
2
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma2 Background CP violation with B 0 -> K S (sin2 ) is well established Agrees with Standard Model Now we need to overconstrain the unitarity triangle to check consistency = arg(V ud V ub * / V cd V cb *) = -arg(V ub ) in standard phase convention Results from BaBar at PEP-II: e + e - -> (4S) -> BB bar ~88 million BB bar pairs
3
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma3 Many Methods – none are easy Amplitude relationships with B - -> D 0 CP K - and friends “Squashed” amplitude triangles: BR(B - D 0 bar K - ) << BR(B - D 0 K - ) Interference involving doubly Cabibbo suppressed D 0 decays sin(2 + ) with B 0 -> D ( * ) - +, +, a 1 +, … Cabibbo suppressed B 0 -> D ( * )+ - Use B 0 -> D s ( * ) and SU(3) to estimate B 0 -> D ( * )+ - Progress on both full and partial reconstruction techniques B -> , K , KK Several options with various theoretical trade-offs
4
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma4 B D 0 CP K and friends D 0 CP = (D 0 D 0 bar ) / 2 : CP even or odd decays, e.g. K + K - Measure sides of amplitude triangles to determine 2 A(B - -> D 0 CP K - ) = A(B - -> D 0 K - ) A(B - -> D 0 bar K - ) 2 A(B - -> D 0 CP K - ) = A(B - -> D 0 K - ) |A(B - -> D 0 bar K - )| e - i e i Sensitivity to depends on r = |A(B - -> D 0 bar K - )| / |A(B - -> D 0 K - )| strong phase weak phase
5
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma5 B - D 0 K - Use D 0 -> K - +, K - + - +, K - + 0 hep-ex/0207087 B -> D 0 with kaon ID cut and 3 m ES cut B -> D 0 K D 0 -> K only PDG: BF(B - -> D 0 - ) = (5.3 0.5)x10 -3 (81M BB bar pairs; 75 fb -1 )
6
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma6 B D 0 CP K B D 0 [K + K ] K 36.8 8.4 4.0 signal events B D 0 [ ] K Upcoming backgrounds from B -> K hep-ex/0207087
7
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma7 Direct CP asymmetry from D 0 CP states: strong phase weak phase B D 0 CP K and friends A CP = 0.17 0.23 +0.09/-0.07 hep-ex/0207087 (81M BB bar pairs; 75 fb -1 )
8
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma8 B - D 0 bar K - Hard: BR(B - D 0 bar K - ) << BR(B - D 0 K - ) Interference from doubly Cabibbo suppressed D 0 decays: B - -> D 0 bar K - (small) --> K + - (big) B - -> D 0 K - (big) --> K + - (small) Plan: Measure B - -> D 0 (bar) K - w/ D 0 bar -> K + -, K + - + -, K + - 0 Measure Multiple D 0 CP modes See Gronau, hep-ph/0211282
9
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma9 B D 0 CP K Summary B - -> D 0 K - measured R(B -> D 0 K/D 0 ) = (8.31 0.35 0.20)% D 0 CP -> K + K - : initial results available Direct Asymmetry: A CP = 0.17 0.23 +0.09/-0.07 More modes (e.g. D 0 CP -> ) in progress More data coming too… Cabibbo suppressed modes in progress… hep-ex/0207087 (81M BB bar pairs; 75 fb -1 )
10
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma10 sin(2 + ) with B 0 D ( * ) Both D ( * )+ - and D ( * )- + from B 0 and B 0 bar Interference -> CP violation B 0 B 0 bar mixing : e -i 2 b -> u : V ub ~ e -i Large difference in branching fractions: BF favored (B 0 -> D ( * )- + ) ~ 3x10 -3 BF suppressed (B 0 -> D ( * )+ - ) ~ 10 -6 Small CP violating effect expected (2%) Measure one weak phase (2 + ) and a strong phase ( ) for each mode in standard phase convention
11
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma11 sin(2 + ) : B 0 D s ( * ) | ( * ) | = ~ 0.02 Use B 0 -> D s ( * )+ - to estimate |A(B 0 -> D ( * )+ - )| via SU(3) symmetry Introduces theoretical uncertainty B 0 -> D s + - Use D s + -> +, K s K +, K* bar K + 21.4 5.1 signal events BF(B 0 -> D s + - ) = (3.2 0.9 1.0) x 10 -5 84M BB bar pairs; 78 fb -1 BF(B 0 -> D s * + - ) < 4.1 x 10 -5 [90% CL] hep-ex/0207053 |A(B 0 bar -> D ( * )- + )| |A(B 0 -> D ( * )- + )| too small to measure w/ current data
12
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma12 sin(2 + ) : Fully reconstructed B 0 D ( * ) Fully reconstruct both D and D* Time evolution for each state f arg( D+ - ) = -(2 + + arg( D- + ) = -(2 + - Four ’s include one weak phase (2 + ) and two strong phases ( ( * ) ) arg( D*+ - ) = -(2 + + * arg( D*- + ) = -(2 + - *
13
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma13 sin(2 + ) : Fully reconstructed B 0 D ( * ) We have thousands of fully reconstructed B 0 -> D and B 0 -> D* The sin(2 + ) fitter is being studied The results aren’t unblinded yet m ES from B 0 -> D - + with 5.2 fb -1 very clean signal now we have almost 20x more data 5.2 fb -1 B 0 D - +
14
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma14 sin(2 + ) : Partially reconstructed B 0 D* Another method: Partial D* reconstruction Reconstruct low momentum in D* -> D , but not rest of D More signal events, but also more background N(tagged) > 40 000 events in full dataset 20.3 fb -1 : only a fraction of the current data, but shows approximate S/B
15
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma15 sin(2 + ) : Partially reconstructed B 0 D* Unreconstructed D daughters could affect tag side vertex position measurement Validate partial reco. method with a lifetime measurement (B 0 ) = (1.510 0.040 0.041) ps (with 20.7 fb -1 ) cf PDG (B 0 ) = (1.548 + 0.032) ps hep-ex/0212012 submitted to PRD Proceeding with sin(2 + ) fit, results not unblinded yet…
16
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma16 B 0 , K , KK Amplitude relationships with B -> , K , KK may also measure or constrain Theoretical interpretation is complicated: Penguins Rescattering contributions SU(3) symmetry breaking etc. For a recent brief review, see Fleischer, hep-ph/0207324 For now we’ll quote branching fractions (BF) and Asymmetries (A) and let you plug the numbers into your favorite theory…
17
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma17 B 0 , K , KK ModeBF x 10 -6 A B 0 -> 0 0 < 3.6 [90% CL] B 0 -> + - 4.7 0.6 0.2 S= 0.02 0.34 ; C= -0.30 0.25 B 0 -> K 0 0 10.4 1.5 0.80.03 0.36 0.09 B 0 -> K + - 17.9 0.9 0.7-0.102 0.050 0.016 B 0 -> K + K - < 0.6 [90% CL] B+ -> + 0 5.5 +1.0 -0.9 0.6-0.03 +0.18 -0.17 0.02 B + -> K + 0 12.8 +1.2 -1.1 1.0-0.09 0.09 0.01 B + -> K 0 + 17.5 +1.8 -1.7 1.3-0.17 0.10 0.02 B + -> K + K 0 bar < 1.3 [90% CL] hep-ex/0207055 hex-ex/0207065 hex-ex/0207063 hep-ex/0206053 (81 fb -1 except K 0 +, K + K 0 bar : 54 fb -1 )
18
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma18 Many More Modes Exploring many other modes which could measure or 2 + : B -> D ( * ) K ( * ) B -> D ( * ) K S B -> D K S B -> D ( * ) K ( * ) Dalitz analysis of B -> etc.
19
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma19 Outlook The Good News: We’re making progress B - -> D 0 CP K - Several sides of amplitude triangles measured A CP = 0.17 0.23 +0.09/-0.07 sin(2 + ) with B 0 -> D ( * ) Decay modes reconstructed Lifetime measurement checks method sin(2 + ) fit results in progress B 0 -> , K , KK Many branching fractions measured Need theoretical input for interpretation Final story will likely involve: B factory measurements of many decay modes Hadronic accelerator results with B s decays Theoretical input
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.