1. Special Education Directors Update Meeting November 2, 2011 Part I Selecting Appropriate Accommodations

2. Goals 2 2009-2010 ELA57.9 Math53.5 2010-2011 ELA68.4 Math65.2

3. Compare District Data to State Goals: HO 1 SCORING PROFICIENT Special Ed State Ave District performance for Sp Ed. Students ** District performance for Regular Ed. Students Differences between Sp Ed and GenEd performance 4 th ELA09-10 40.0% 10-11 48.0% 4 th Math09-10 48.0% 10-11 52.0% 8 th ELA09-10 21.0% 10-11 28.0% 8 th Math09-10 25.0% 10-11 31.0% **2009-10 http://www.louisianaschools.net/lde/uploads/17227.pdfhttp://www.louisianaschools.net/lde/uploads/17227.pdf **2010-11 (unpublished at this time)

4. Did You Know … SLD OHI SPCH ED WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR EDUCATORS? AVERAGE COGNITIVE ABILITIES Learn differently Express knowledge differently 4

5. Decision Making Process for Accommodations

6. HO 4 STUDENT Characteristics about student or disability Strengths Weaknesses Student/Parent/Teacher Preferences SETTING Environmental Elements: Noise Conditions Grouping Pull Out vs. Inclusion TASK What task is the student unable to do at the expected level? Presentation Response (connect to tools) ACCOMMODATIONS Consider new accommodations. Instruction State testing FIDELITY CHECK List any goals or curriculum area from the IEP/IAP in which the student did not make expected progress or achieve the goal. Was there any accommodation(s)? List. Was there a predetermined plan for how the accommodation was implemented? Did all team members know the plan? Was the accommodation implemented correctly and consistently? How do you know? Was the accommodation successful? What criterion was used to make that determination? If the accommodation was unsuccessful, is there a need to change or remove the accommodation? Why was it unsuccessful? If the accommodation was successful, is it still needed? Is there any other need for an accommodation? MONITOR PROGRESS Review List Check for fidelity Decision Making Process

7. Fidelity Check 7 Review of the previous IEP or IAP: List any goals or curriculum area from the IEP/IAP in which the student did not make expected progress or achieve the goal. Was/Were there any accommodation(s)? List. Was there a predetermined plan for how the accommodation was implemented? Did all team members know the plan? Was the accommodation implemented correctly and consistently? How do you know? Was the accommodation successful? What criterion was used to make that determination? If the accommodation was unsuccessful, is there a need to change or remove the accommodation? Why was it unsuccessful? If the accommodation was successful, is it still needed? Is there any other need for an accommodation?

8. 8 N.C. Department of Education http://www.accselpro.org / http://www.accselpro.org / Accommodations Instructional Testing Report Accommodations Selected Discrepancies Accommodation Details Print or save as PDF

9. 9 AccSelPro – N.C. Department of Education http://www.accselpro.org/ Requires Flash

10. 10

11. 11

12. 12

13. 13 Instructional Accommodations

14. 14 Testing Accommodations

15. 15

16. 16 Report

17. 17 Accommodations Selected

18. 18 Accommodation Discrepancies

19. 19 Accommodation Details – Screen Reader – (!)

20. Have you considered technology lately? 20 Google Chrome Extensions Auto summarize – http://smmry.com/

21. Contacts Kristina Braud LA Dept of Education Program Coordinator Mild/Moderate Disabilities Kristina.braud@la.gov 1-877-453-2721 Donna Broussard LA Dept of Education Education Technology Consultant Donna.broussard@la.gov (225) 342-3712 21 Access Guide http://accessguide.doe.louisiana.gov/default.aspx http://accessguide.doe.louisiana.gov/default.aspx LATI http://www.louisianaschools.net/divisions/specialp/assistive_technology.html http://www.louisianaschools.net/divisions/specialp/assistive_technology.html LDE http://www.louisianaschools.net http://www.louisianaschools.net

22. 22