Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

What Do We Mean by "Electronic Structure"? Jeffrey J. Kay Massachusetts Institute of Technology Christian Jungen Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "What Do We Mean by "Electronic Structure"? Jeffrey J. Kay Massachusetts Institute of Technology Christian Jungen Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique."— Presentation transcript:

1 What Do We Mean by "Electronic Structure"? Jeffrey J. Kay Massachusetts Institute of Technology Christian Jungen Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Robert W. Field Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 20, 2007 NSF

2 Scattering (MQDT) vs. Born- Oppenheimer Multichannel Quantum Defect Theory:  (Q) –What, where, why, and how much? –Global: all states, all dynamics Born-Oppenheimer: H(q,Q) –Stuff happens –State by state

3 π * quantum defect is the radial phase shift: Phase shift (and dependence on R, etc) tells you everything about electronic wavefunction Example: R-dependence of QD gives R-dependence of electronic wavefunction and governs strength of vibrationally nonadiabatic interactions μ = 0 μ = 0.25 nucleus Quantum Defect & Radial Wavefunction

4 What Does the Rydberg Electron See? Z=1 ion-core at long-range –Multipole moments and polarizabilities Z(r)>>1: Z eff ℓ >1 and not-round at short- range – phase shift  quantum defect matrix –l-mixing Electronic excitation of ion-core at short- range: permanent vs. temporary –Main subject of this talk

5 F–F– M 2+ x r C.O.M. r = 2.70 Å (r = 2.70 Å for CaF + ) Turning Points } Penetrating vs. Nonpenetrating Rydberg Orbitals

6 DIRECT INDIRECT A B + e-e- + e-e- B A A* B* e-e- AB + Electronically Excited Temporary Core Excitation

7 DIRECT INDIRECT A B + e-e- + B A A* B* e-e- AB + Electronically Excited Permanent Core Excitation

8 Pattern-Breaking = Resonance 3 kinds of broken patterns: from local to global –Local perturbation –Curve crossing –Channel crossing Each accommodated by a matrix deperturbation model

9 Reduced Term Values Level Shifts Two-Level Avoided Crossing

10 Two-State Avoided Crossing

11 K 11 K 22 K 12 μ α (1) μ α (2) μ 11 μ 22 (R-R e + ) Energy One parameter controls an infinite number of interactions Reaction Matrix Elements Quantum Defects Energy Levels (R-R e + ) Two-Channel Avoided Crossing

12 Lowest Electronic States of CaF X A B C D E E’ Ion RKR

13 Quantum Defect Functions AB + AB * Vertical energy difference = E ion - E nL Invert R-dependent Rydberg formula

14 Surprising Similarity to Ion: with one exception! RKR One deviation from linearity

15 Eigenquantum Defects vs. R RKR Note the absence of pairwise interactions. C 2 π A 2 π

16 Eigenquantum Defects vs. R RKR C 2 π “Extra” repulsion at small R “Relaxation” to smaller QD derivative at large R

17

18

19 Overlap Repulsion Fix this by mixing some F  orbital into Ca  orbitals to enforce orthogonality. Effectively transfers charge from F to Ca. At low n*, n* -3/2 scaled amplitude in inner lobes results in overlap with F . Violates exclusion principle! Ca + F-F- Ca δ+ Fδ-Fδ- This looks like configuration interaction. Ca + F-F- Ca δ+ Fδ-Fδ- Ca 0 F0F0 +

20 Core Excitation So the solution is to add covalent channels to our electronic reaction, K, and phase, P, matrices. There are two: Ca + F 0 ( 1 Σ + ) + e - Ca + F 0 ( 1 Π ) + e - These are: 1.The Sigma and Pi repulsive valence states 2.Low-n* termini of Rydberg series converging to the first and second electronically-excited states of the CaF + ion- core.

21 R = 3.6 a0 R = 3.2 a0 R = 4.0 a0 Driving Force for CI

22 n* = 3 Diagonal Elements R-Independent With channel coupling Without channel coupling Quantum Defect (R-R e + ) [a0] Two-Channel Problem

23 n* = 5 Diagonal Elements R-Independent With channel coupling Without channel coupling Quantum Defect (R-R e + ) [a0] Two-Channel Problem

24 Electronic Structure: Causal vs. Descriptive Electronic structure of cation embedded in MQDT description of neutral Unified view of influence of cation excited states –Permanent effects: autoionization and predissociation –Indirect effects: breakdown of propensity rules –New insight: low-n* distortion of potential curves

25

26 Multichannel Quantum Defect Theory (1) is phase shift (relative to H) n* δ ℓ is quantum defect independent of n dependent on ℓ independent of ℓ Eigenquantum defect R-dependent mixed ℓ 1+1+ Hydrogen e-e- Sodium 11 + 1+1+ e-e- CaF 20 + ++ 1+1+ e-e- reaction matrix phase matrix quantum defect matrix

27 - EigenvalueCondition: Reaction Matrix Phase Matrix N (rotation) and p (parity): Rigorously good Quantum Numbers Elements of Reaction Matrix: Non-Diagonal Reaction Matrix: Effective Principal Quantum Number Elements of Diagonal Phase Matrix: Quantum Defects Quantum Defect Theory [2]

28 Shape resonance

29 Diagonal qds and eqds Sigma n=3 and infinity Range 1.5 Idea is to show several E dependent channel crossings, make connection to shape resonance?

30 Diagonal qds and eqds Pi n=3 and infinity, range 1.5 Idea is to show some E dependent channel crossings

31 Diagonal qds and eqds Delta n=3 range of 1.5 n=infinity range of 1.5 Idea is to show absence of any E dependent channel crossings

32 Polarized Orbitals p - d p + d pπpπpπpπ dπdπdπdπ + Ca 2+ F-F- F-F- F-F- F-F- “normal polarization” “reverse polarization”

33 Beyond Ligand Field Theory What does the ligand field picture neglect? Two effects due to overlap of Ca + and F - orbitals: “Pauli Repulsion” (Destabilizing) Wavefunctions of two fermions with parallel spin must be orthogonal Metal and ligand orbitals mix to “orthogonalize” individual orbitals Exchange (Stabilizing) Exclusion principle: Result: Can be treated as a strong “repulsion” in an effective one-electron treatment. Coulomb (Mixing)

34 Core Excitation DIRECT INDIRECT B A + e-e- + e-e- A B B* A* e-e- (AB + + e - ) Electronically Excited

35 Orbitals that shield the Ca  from the F  have positive d   /dR

36 Quantum Defects Hydrogen AtomSodium Atom Principal Quantum Number (Integer) Effective Principal Quantum Number (Noninteger) QUANTUM DEFECT

37 Quantum Defects Sodium AtomMolecule Rydberg Series converging to each ion core energy level

38 Two-State Avoided Crossing

39 - Eigenvalue Condition: Reaction Matrix Phase Matrix N (rotation) and p (parity) are Good Quantum Numbers Elements of Non-Diagonal Reaction Matrix: Effective Principal Quantum Number Elements of Diagonal Phase Matrix: MQDT (2)

40 Two-Level Avoided Crossing

41

42 Quantum Defects Hydrogen Atom Sodium Atom Diatomic Molecule No Quantum Defect Nonzero Quantum Defect R-Dependent Nondiagonal Quantum Defect Matrix p+p+ Na + AB +

43 Core Excited Channels n* = 4 n* = 5 n* = 6 n* = 7 X 1 Σ + “n*” = 1.5 A 1 Σ + Red: Repulsive state as “core-excited” Rydberg state Black: Normal Rydberg states Ca 0 ( 1 S) + F 0 ( 2 P) Ca 2+ F - ( 1 Σ + ) + e - Ca 2+ F - ( 1 Σ + ) Ca + ( 2 S) + F 0 ( 2 P)

44 Cubic Fit The C 2 Π state Has a cubic R-dependence! RKR

45 Quantum Defect & Radial Wavefunction π * quantum defect is the radial phase shift: Phase shift (and dependence on R, etc) tells you everything about electronic wavefunction Example: R-dependence of QD gives R-dependence of electronic wavefunction and governs strength of vibrationally nonadiabatic interactions μ = 0 μ = -0.25 nucleus

46

47

48

49

50

51

52 Two-Channel Avoided Crossing


Download ppt "What Do We Mean by "Electronic Structure"? Jeffrey J. Kay Massachusetts Institute of Technology Christian Jungen Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google