Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 1 27.06.2008 Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.

Published byIsaac Parrish Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 1 27.06.2008 Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 1 27.06.2008 Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University of Bonn Regional high resolution geoid and mean sea surface topography determination by a combination of GOCE, GRACE and altimetry data

2 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 2 27.06.2008 Overview ITG-Goce: Global GOCE SGG only solution ITG-Goce: Global GOCE SGG only solution Regional gravity field refinement GRACE + GOCE + Altimetry Regional gravity field refinement GRACE + GOCE + Altimetry Regional gravity field refinement GRACE + GOCE Regional gravity field refinement GRACE + GOCE

3 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 3 27.06.2008 GOCE data ITG-Goce (preliminary results) 1 month of data: - gradiometer data - star camera data - orbit data Computed with the short arc method: For each short arc (15 min) - full variance covariance - bias parameter for each SGG component - SST contribution is missing yet ITG-Goce (preliminary results) 1 month of data: - gradiometer data - star camera data - orbit data Computed with the short arc method: For each short arc (15 min) - full variance covariance - bias parameter for each SGG component - SST contribution is missing yet

4 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 4 27.06.2008 Median degree variances formal errors signal

5 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 5 27.06.2008 Median degree variances formal errors signal Difference ITG-Goce – EIGEN-05c Difference ITG-Goce – EIGEN-05c

6 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 6 27.06.2008 Median degree variances formal errors signal Difference ITG-Goce – EIGEN-05c Difference ITG-Goce – EIGEN-05c Difference ITG-Goce – ITG-Grace2010s Difference ITG-Goce – ITG-Grace2010s

7 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 7 27.06.2008 Regional gravity field recovery Global reference solution Regional refinement Spherical harmonics Spherical splines GOCE GRACE

8 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 8 27.06.2008 ITG-Grace2010s gravity anomalies

9 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 9 27.06.2008 ITG-Grace2010s gravity anomalies

10 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 10 27.06.2008 Representation of geoid heights The residual gravity field represented by a linear combination of localizing basis functions Harmonic Splines shape coefficients (expected spectral content)

11 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 11 27.06.2008 Observation equations This approach has similarities to: - regularization - combination with spectral weighting - least squares collocation This approach has similarities to: - regularization - combination with spectral weighting - least squares collocation normal equations GOCE GRACE field For the descripition of the theory see Eicker (2006)

12 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 12 27.06.2008 ITG-Grace2010s Results – gravity anomalies +

13 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 13 27.06.2008 Regional gravity field recovery Global reference solution Regional refinement Spherical harmonics Spherical splines GOCE GRACE

14 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 14 27.06.2008 Regional gravity field recovery Global reference solution Regional refinement Spherical harmonics Spherical splines GOCE GRACE Altimetry T/P, ERS 1/2,... Altimetry T/P, ERS 1/2,...

15 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 15 27.06.2008 Altimetry data (T/P, ERS 1/2, …) Altimetry Altimetry can improve the resolution of the GRACE/GOCE geoid. But: Altimeter satellites measures the sea surface height (SSH) and not the geoid height => Combined estimation of geoid and MDT Altimetry can improve the resolution of the GRACE/GOCE geoid. But: Altimeter satellites measures the sea surface height (SSH) and not the geoid height => Combined estimation of geoid and MDT MDT Geoid height SSH Sea surface Geoid Ellipsoid

16 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 16 27.06.2008 Altimetry data (T/P, ERS 1/2, …) Altimetry Observation equation MDT Geoid height SSH Sea surface Geoid Ellipsoid mean sea surface height geoid height mean dynamic topography =+ Localizing basis functions adapted to the spectral contenent of the residual gravity field Localizing basis functions adapted to the spectral contenent of the MDT

17 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 17 27.06.2008 Observation equations Complete observation equations Relative weighting of each set of observations by the variance component estimation method (VCE) (Koch & Kusche 2001) Altimetry GRACE field apriori (stochastical) information from MDT GOCE gravityMDT

18 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 18 27.06.2008 Results – gravity anomalies + + +

19 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 19 27.06.2008 Results – mean dynamic topography

20 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 20 27.06.2008 Results – gravity anomalies + + +

21 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 21 27.06.2008 Results – gravity anomalies + +

22 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 22 27.06.2008 EGM2008 Results – gravity anomalies + +

23 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 23 27.06.2008 EGM2008 Results – gravity anomalies + + Differences (RMS 8 mGal)

24 Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 24 27.06.2008 Summary Refinenemt of GRACE + GOCE gravity field with Altimetry (T/P, ERS 1/2,...) leads to: - Regional high resolution Geoid - Estimation of the mean dynamic topography (MDT) Refinenemt of GRACE + GOCE gravity field with Altimetry (T/P, ERS 1/2,...) leads to: - Regional high resolution Geoid - Estimation of the mean dynamic topography (MDT) GeoidTopography -GOCE improves the gravity field compared to GRACE in the high degrees - Our first GOCE solution (ITG-Goce) fits better to ITG-Grace2010s than to EIGEN-05C in the medium degrees (n=90…150) -GOCE improves the gravity field compared to GRACE in the high degrees - Our first GOCE solution (ITG-Goce) fits better to ITG-Grace2010s than to EIGEN-05C in the medium degrees (n=90…150)

Download ppt "Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen 1 27.06.2008 Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University."

Similar presentations

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.

Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.
ARCGICE WP 4.3 Recommendations for inclusion of GOCE data C.C.Tscherning & S.Laxon C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCLA, 2006-10-20 1.

ARCGICE WP 4.3 Recommendations for inclusion of GOCE data C.C.Tscherning & S.Laxon C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCLA,
From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)

From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.

GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.

National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.
Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.

Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.
ARCGICE WP 2.2 ERROR ESTIMATION OF NEW GEOID C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, 2005-03-01 1.

ARCGICE WP 2.2 ERROR ESTIMATION OF NEW GEOID C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
ARCGICE WP 2.1 Leader: DSPC Make new geoid of afrctic region based on GRACE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, 2005-03-01 1.

ARCGICE WP 2.1 Leader: DSPC Make new geoid of afrctic region based on GRACE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.

COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.
CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January 12 2006.

CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January
ARCGICE WP 1.4 ERROR ESTIMATES IN SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL DOMAINS C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, 2005-03-01 1.

ARCGICE WP 1.4 ERROR ESTIMATES IN SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL DOMAINS C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
ARCGICE WP 5.2 Plan for development of Atctic geoid using GOCE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, 2005-03-01 1.

ARCGICE WP 5.2 Plan for development of Atctic geoid using GOCE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
ARCGICE WP 5.1 Leader: UCL Synthesis report on benefit of combining data C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, 2005-03-01 1.

ARCGICE WP 5.1 Leader: UCL Synthesis report on benefit of combining data C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 1 Gravity Field.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 1 Gravity Field.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005

Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.

Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.

Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.
Institut für Erdmessung (IfE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Quality Assessment of GOCE Gradients Phillip Brieden, Jürgen Müller living planet.

Institut für Erdmessung (IfE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Quality Assessment of GOCE Gradients Phillip Brieden, Jürgen Müller living planet.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google