1. Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Baltimore, MD Todd Drager Faculty Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Baltimore, MD Structural Option

2. Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Topic Overview Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage

3. Building Information Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Building RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Owner: Maryland Stadium Authority Architect: Conchran, Stephenson & Donkervoet, inc. Associate Architect: Sasaki Associates, inc. Structural Engineer: Hope Furrer, Associates, inc. Mechanical Engineer: James Posey Associates, inc. Electrical Engineer: Diversified Engineering, inc. Civil Engineer: Site Resources, inc. CM Firm: Gilbane Building Co. Coppin State University Physical Education Complex

4. Building InformationBuilding RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Owner: Maryland Stadium Authority Location: North Baltimore (Baltimore City) Height: Varies 30’-60’ Size: 155,200 Sqft. Expected Completion: 2009 Project Delivery Method : Design-Bid Build Estimated Cost: $102 million Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

5. Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Building Information Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Building RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage - Exterior: red brick, glass -Exposed steel trusses over 4100 seat arena -Spaces Include basketball arena, 8-lane swimming pool, racquetball courts, gym, classrooms, management facilities -Surrounds Soccer Field -Structurally sub-divided by 3 expansion joints Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

6. Existing Structural SystemsBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Composite Steel Floor System -W-shapes widespread as Beams and Columns -Typical Beam Spacing @10’ -Typical Girder Spacing @31’ -Concrete Strength f’c=4000psi -Lateral System Composed of Braced Frames and Moment Frames -Foundation Composed of Spread Footings Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

7. Existing Arena Structural SystemsBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Columns: W10’s, W12’s, W14’s -Floor Height = 15’ -Braced Frames T1 – T4 (E-W direction) -Moment Frames T5 – T9 (N-S direction) -Roof Trusses transfer Lateral Load Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

8. ProposalBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Both Gravity and Lateral Systems proved successful -Baltimore City has been underfunded and slow to update buildings -Goal was to revitalize the area and improve architecture by changing structural elements -Primary Focus: Arena Trusses -Breadths: Architecture, Construction Management Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

9. Architectural Breadth IntroBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Goal: Make Arena more prominent -Current Height: 60’ -Surrounding Building Heights: 30’-60’ -Current Arena Capacity: 4100 Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

10. Architectural Breadth Intro Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

11. Lateral System RedesignArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Current Moment Frames(N-S) use heavy, expensive shapes -Replacing with shear walls could save money

12. Lateral System RedesignArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Trusses use similar formation as current trusses -Shear Walls at 4 corners -Few openings due to doors -Roof diaphragm shuffles load into shear walls

13. Lateral System RedesignArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

14. Roof TrussesArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Trusses different for interior and exterior -Sized using ETABS and SAP and checked by hand -Designed with both lateral and gravity load -Typical Members: W14x68 W14x61 HSS6x6x.5

15. Shear WallsStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Wind Load Paths (From North) Total Input Load=208.3k x 1.6= 333.3k Load CaseWall ElementShear(k)Overturning Moment('k)Drift 41156220.11 29.31390.09 3153.554130.23 4141.677830.27 Total319.4 Wind Load Paths (From South) Total Input Load=281.9k x 1.6= 451k Load CaseWall ElementShear(k)Overturning Moment('k)Drift 11133.754500.15 236.313000.12 3183.554500.31 4184.468500.36 Total437.9 - Governing Load Combination: 0.9D +1.6W

16. Shear WallsStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - All Reinforcement #4 @ 20in. o.c. except where noted *Area 1: Contains 2#7 at the end and 2 sets of 2#4 spaced at 10” *Area 2: Contains 2#5 at 10in. o.c. *Area 3: Contains #4 at 10in. o.c

17. Additional 5 th FloorTypical Framing PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Use RAM Structural System to analyze new floor -All relevant load cases considered Deflection Limited to L/360 LL and L/240 TL DLLL Area Load60psf100psf Area Load60psf20psf Line Load0.39klf Line Load0.5klf Occupiable Space

18. Girder OptimizationTypical Framing PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Under the assumption that cost of 10lb. Of steel ~ 1 shear stud 5th Floor Girder Optimization G1SpanMoment('k)Shear(k)Section# StudsTotal Equiv 31'346.2433.63W16x26401206 W18x35161245 W16x31271231 G2SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 38.3'230.2519.48W16x26161156 G3SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 31'180.3624.4W12x1931899 W14x2216842 G4SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 34'292.7531.33W18x40111470 G5SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 34'257.0924.99W14x22361042 W16x2616966 W16x31141101

19. 5 th Floor Framing PlanTypical Framing PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

20. Architectural BreadthArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion USC - The Coliseum Duke – Cameron Indoor Stadium OSU – The Horseshoe UNM - The Pit

21. Architectural BreadthArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

22. New Plans Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

23. New Plans Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

24. New PlansExisting ElevationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

25. New ElevationsExisting ElevationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

26. ModelExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion **THIS IS WHERE THE 3D WALKTHROUGH BELONGS, BUT WILL NOT PLAY IN POWERPOINT.**  - SEE AVI VIDEO ON WEBSITE.

27. New RenderingExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

28. View From 5 th FloorExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

29. View From 5 th FloorExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

30. Model on MapExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Campus

31. Construction Management BreadthExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Primary Focus: Cost, Scheduling Implications -Considerations: Materials, Labor, Time

32. Cost Analysis Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

33. Cost AnalysisExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Lateral Changes: -$680,000 + Gravity Changes: $560,000 = Total: -$120,000 ……………………………………….$120,000 Savings

34. Scheduling AnalysisExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Schedule Modifications Duration(days) Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 11 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 12 Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 21 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 22 Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 31 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 32 Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 41 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 42 Modified Truss Installment0 Additional Framing (5th floor)2 Pour Additional Slab2 Erection of Additional Columns1 Building of extra 15' of exterior wall14 Installment of roof glass panels1 Modification to footing sizes0 Total 32

35. Scheduling AnalysisExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Cost due to delayed schedule: Assumption: General Conditions Fees ~ 1% through duration of project $102 million project = $34,000/mo. 32 day delay => $50,000 additional cost Material/Labor + Time = -$120,000 + $50,000 = $70,000 Savings

36. ConclusionExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Lateral System: N-S system from moment frames to shear walls Modified Arena Trusses w/ less steel Gravity System: Additional 5 th Floor CM: Less Material Costs, Extended Schedule Architecture: Arena more monumental

37. Questions?AcknowledgementsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion ? Thanks to: -Hope Furrer Associates -The Maryland Stadium Authority -Gilbane -Dr. Lepage, Dr. Parfitt & the rest of the AE faculty -My classmates, friends and family

39. Foundation ChangesStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Spread Footings enlarged from 10’ x 10’ x 38” to 12’ x 12’ x 38” See Appendix D in report for calculations

40. TorsionStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Torsion Shear W1: 4.8k W2: 4.4k W3: 4.4k W4: 4.8k Direct Shear W1: 33.7k W2: 36.3k W3: 183.5k W4: 184.4k Total Shear W1: 38.5k W2: 31.9k W3: 187.9k W4: 176.6k