Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-09 April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP-51-39.

Published byDarlene Gray Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-09 April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP-51-39."— Presentation transcript:

1 Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-09 April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP-51-39 (51st GRSP, 21 – 25 May 2012, agenda item 20)

2 Background & Purpose NTSEL (type approval test department in Japan) uses the acceleration type sled test system. So, it is necessary to compare the results of the CRS side impact sled test between when tested by the deceleration type sled system and when tested by the acceleration type sled test system. We conducted CRS side impact sled tests using the acceleration type sled test system: 1. to compare the test severity between deceleration sled and acceleration sled 2. to confirm main test parameters which determine dummy injury measures.

3 Parameters of New Side Impact Test Intrusion Relative velocity between door and sled Door intrusion There are 2 parameters for the dynamic Side Impact Test Procedure.

4 Concept of CRS Side Impact Test Using the Acceleration Type Sled System

5 Photos before sled tests Our jig for the CRS side impact test using the acceleration type sled system

6 Video

7 Test Concept The concept is that the door moves with the sled, and the seat moves on the sled. Relative velocity Intrusion Door velocity

8 Influence of Door Ground Velocity

9 Testing the Influence of Door Ground Velocity 6.6m/s 6.0m/s5.3m/s We tested 3 door ground velocities. Door intrusions were the same. Relative velocities were different.

10 Door ground velocities influences dummy injury measures Testing the Influence of Door Ground Velocity Head resultant accelerations

11 Dummy velocity catches up with door velocity. Reason Why Door Ground Velocity Influences Dummy Injury Measures To catch up with door velocity, the dummy needs to get enough energy. So, under the same conditions except for the door ground velocity in our tests, the relative velocity between door and dummy influences dummy injury measures. Relative velocity between door and dummy is important.

12 Influence of Relative Velocity between Door and Seat

13 Test of Influence of Relative Velocity The relative velocities between door and seat, and door intrusions of 2 tests are almost similar. Test A Test B

14 Relative Velocity Intrusion Relative velocity and intrusion are almost same Test of Influence of Relative Velocity

15 Same relative velocity but different injury measures ⇒ The relative velocity has little influence on injury measures. Dummy head acceleration Test of Influence of Relative Velocity

16 Velocity Time Problem of the Test Procedure Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity The current draft regulation that defines solely relative velocity allows various test conditions to be set.

17 Velocity Time Problem of the Test Procedure Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity The door speed is constant and the seat is moved rapidly (Test A condition) Impact time of dummy and Door Relative velocity between door and dummy

18 Velocity Time Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity Problem of the Test Procedure The door speed decreases and the seat stops (Test B condition) Impact time of dummy and Door Relative velocity between door and dummy

19 Velocity Time Problem of the Test Procedure Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity The door speed decreases and the seat moves (Various conditions between Test A and B) Impact time of dummy and Door Relative velocity between door and dummy

20 We get same results using the deceleration sled, if the door is moving when the door hit the CRS. Same Results in Deceleration Type Sled Dummy SLED Door CRS

21 Velocity Time Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity The door stops and the seat speed decreases in corridor (Same condition as Test A) Problem of the Test Procedure in Deceleration Type Sled Impact time of dummy and Door Relative velocity between door and dummy

22 Velocity Time Problem of the Test Procedure in Deceleration Type Sled Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity The door speed increases and the seat speed is constant (Same condition as Test B) Impact time of dummy and Door Relative velocity between door and dummy

23 Velocity Time Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity The door speed increases and the seat speed decreases (Various conditions) Problem of the Test Procedure in Deceleration Type Sled Relative velocity between door and dummy Impact time of dummy and Door

24 Same Severity Condition Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity The relative velocity between the door and the dummy is the same, both tested by moving the door at a constant speed on the acceleration type sled, and tested by keeping the door fixed on the deceleration type sled. Velocity Time Impact time of dummy and Door Velocity Time Relative velocity Between door and dummy Acceleration type sled Deceleration type sled

25 Conclusion It is possibility that the relative velocity between door and dummy influences dummy injury measures. Under the condition which satisfy the CRS side impact test procedure of the new regulation, dummy injury measures varied. The current draft regulation that defines solely relative velocity allows various test conditions to be set. Additional conditions are needed for the CRS side impact test procedure of the new regulation to make the conditions the same in various tests.

26 Japanese Proposal Add door ground velocity to define one test condition In a test which the door is moving at T = 0ms, (i) the door ground velocity shall be between [6.375m/s] and [7.25m/s] at least the time when the door intrusion is maximum, and (ii) dummy is stayed at T = 0ms. In a test which the door is stayed at T = 0ms, (i) the door shall be fixed, and (ii) the dummy’s [chest] ground velocity shall be between [6.375m/s] and [7.25m/s] at T = 0ms.

27 Japanese Proposal Velocity Time Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity Additional corridor Acceleration type sled

28 Japanese Proposal Relative VelocityCorridor Door VelocitySeat Velocity Add door velocity Deceleration type sled Velocity Time Add dummy velocity at T = 0ms

Download ppt "Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-09 April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP-51-39."

Similar presentations

51 st GRSP Session Draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP-51-34 (51 st GRSP, 21 - 24 May 2012, agenda item.

51 st GRSP Session Draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012, agenda item.
Acceleration Acceleration Velocity-time graph Questions.

Acceleration Acceleration Velocity-time graph Questions.
GTR Head restraints ES-62 08.09.2006 Page 1 HR-7-8 GTR Head restraints Dynamic test procedure Trigger-point in dynamic test procedure.

GTR Head restraints ES Page 1 HR-7-8 GTR Head restraints Dynamic test procedure Trigger-point in dynamic test procedure.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP-47-27 (47th session, 17-21 May 2010, agenda.

47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
Kinematics – the study of how things move

Kinematics – the study of how things move
Impact-Shield Type CRS in JNCAP National Agency for Automotive Safety and Victims ’ Aid Informal document No. GRSP-43-28-Rev.1 (43rd GRSP, 19-23 May 2008.

Impact-Shield Type CRS in JNCAP National Agency for Automotive Safety and Victims ’ Aid Informal document No. GRSP Rev.1 (43rd GRSP, May 2008.
Utac Comparison tests on full crash test facility and hyge sled test facility in the frame of Regulation ECE R16.

Utac Comparison tests on full crash test facility and hyge sled test facility in the frame of Regulation ECE R16.
2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP-56-34.

2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC.3 141 th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP.29-141-23, 13-16 March 2007, agenda item II.2.5.6.

Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
Decision IWG ECRS 2014-07-02. General If no agreement can be found before the GRSP 56th meeting, GRSP should decide on the chairman proposal.

Decision IWG ECRS General If no agreement can be found before the GRSP 56th meeting, GRSP should decide on the chairman proposal.
Status report GRSP IWG ECRS 53rd GRSP Geneva May 2013 Informal document GRSP-53-22 (53 nd GRSP, 13 - 17 May 2013, agenda item 19)

Status report GRSP IWG ECRS 53rd GRSP Geneva May 2013 Informal document GRSP (53 nd GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 19)
52 nd GRSP Session IWG on draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP-52-17 (52 nd GRSP, 11 - 14 December 2012,

52 nd GRSP Session IWG on draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (52 nd GRSP, December 2012,
ECE Regulation N°94 & N°13X 19/05/201455th Session GRSP 19-23 May 2014 Status report IWG FI 55th session of GRSP 19-23 May 2014 Informal document GRSP-55-43.

ECE Regulation N°94 & N°13X 19/05/201455th Session GRSP May 2014 Status report IWG FI 55th session of GRSP May 2014 Informal document GRSP
Forty-second session of GRSP 11-14 December 2007 1 REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments Proposal submitted by France Informal.

Forty-second session of GRSP December REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments Proposal submitted by France Informal.
STATUS OF CRS IN BUSES AND COACHES 44TH GRSP (9-12 DECEMBER) Informal document No. GRSP-44-29 (44th GRSP, 10-13 December 2008, agenda item 19(b))

STATUS OF CRS IN BUSES AND COACHES 44TH GRSP (9-12 DECEMBER) Informal document No. GRSP (44th GRSP, December 2008, agenda item 19(b))
Head-on Collision ME115 FALL 2006 Final Project Instructor: Professor Granda By Blong Xiong Department of Mechanical Engineering California State University,

Head-on Collision ME115 FALL 2006 Final Project Instructor: Professor Granda By Blong Xiong Department of Mechanical Engineering California State University,
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP-44-23 (44th session, 10-12 December 2008,

44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008,
20.10.2015 Dimensions of Universal Boosters 43th meeting of the GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems 25 th March 2014 Speaker: Franz Peleska.

Dimensions of Universal Boosters 43th meeting of the GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems 25 th March 2014 Speaker: Franz Peleska.
46th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP-46-38 (46th session, 8 - 11 December 2009,

46th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (46th session, December 2009,
Proposal Regarding Amendment of the CRS Regulation at ECE/GRSP’s CRS Informal Group 2 September 2008 JASIC Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization.

Proposal Regarding Amendment of the CRS Regulation at ECE/GRSP’s CRS Informal Group 2 September 2008 JASIC Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google