Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Determining cosmological parameters with the latest observational data Hong Li TPCSF/IHEP 2009.3.16.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Determining cosmological parameters with the latest observational data Hong Li TPCSF/IHEP 2009.3.16."— Presentation transcript:

1 Determining cosmological parameters with the latest observational data Hong Li TPCSF/IHEP 2009.3.16

2 The cosmological observations play a crucial role in understanding universe ! CMB 、 LSS and SN Complementary, GRB and WL also make interesting progress ! Recent years Cosmology became more and more accurate There are also some ongoing ………

3 outline The global fitting analysis The constraints on cosmological parameters, especially the time evolving EOS of DE with CMB, LSS, SNe Constraints on EOS including GRBs & WL Testing the featured P(k) with observations Summary

4 Global fitting procedure  Cosmological parameters:  Method : modified CosmoMC, Perturbation included G.-B. Zhao, et al., PRD 72 123515 (2005)  Calculated at ShangHai Supercomputer Center (SSC)  Data: CMB, LSS, SNe ……. 1.w = constant 2. Perturbation divergent when w across -1, new method 3.

5 Constrains on dark energy with SN Ia (Riess) + SDSS + WMAP-1 Observing dark energy dynamics with supernova, microwave background and galaxy clustering Jun-Qing Xia, Gong-Bo Zhao, Bo Feng, Hong Li and Xinmin Zhang Phys.Rev.D73, 063521, 2006 The importance of DE perturbation!

6 2007.6.5 IHEP Constraints on EOS with WMAP3 Relative error: ~9% Relative error > 50% !! * Emphasizing the importance of the perturbation of DE * A constant EOS considered by the WMAP group

7 Quintessece Quintom A Quintom B Phantom Current constraint on the equation of state of dark energy WMAP5 result E. Komatsu et al., arXiv:0803.0547 Xia, Li, Zhao, Zhang, PRD. 78, 083524 Status: 1) Cosmological constant fits data well; 2) Dynamical model not ruled out; 3) Best fit value of equation of state: slightly w across -1  Quintom model Difference: Data: SN (SNLS+ESSENCE+Riess et al.) vs SN (307,Kowalski et al., arXiv:0804.4142) Method: WMAP distance prior vs Full CMB data. However, results similar (Li et al., arXiv: 0805.1118)

8 APJ Lett. 683, L1, 2008

9

10 For the published version : WMAP5 result E. Komatsu et al., Astrophys.J.Suppl.180:330-376,2009 Xia, Li, Zhao, Zhang, PRD. 78, 083524

11

12 Preliminary results With the new CFA (SN), CBI and QUaD data:

13 Global analysis of the cosmological parameters including GRBs  Results from the global analysis with WMAP3+LSS+SNe(Riess 182 samples)+GRBs (Schaefer 69 sample)  New method for solution of the circulation problem

14 the 69 modulus published by Schaefer (in astro-ph/0612285)

15 Bias with only GRB Need global analysis

16 Hong Li, M. su, Z.H. Fan, Z.G. Dai and X.Zhang, astro-ph/0612060, Phys.Lett.B658:95-100,2008 WMAP3+LSS+SN WMAP3+LSS+SN+GRB

17 The relevant papers on studies with GRBs : E.L.Wright astro-ph/0701584 F.Y. Wang, Z. G. Dai and Z. H. Zhu, astro-ph/0706.0938

18 Problems: The circulation problem : Due to the lack of the low-redshift GRBs, the experiential correlation is obtained from the high- redshift GRBs with input cosmology !

19 S_r: is the fluence of the r-ray; t_j: is the Break time; n: is the circumburst particle Density; E_peak: is the peak energy of the spectrum What is the circulation problem? Due to the lack of the low-redshift GRBs, the experiential correlations are obtained from the high-redshift GRBs with input cosmology which we intend to constrain, it lead to the circulation problem! From the observation, we can get: S_r, E_peak,t_j, n With a fire ball GRB model: Ghirlanda et al.

20 Usually Input a cosmology Get A & C

21 A new method for overcoming the circulation problem for GRBs in global analysis We integrate them out in order to get the constraint on the cosmological parameter: We let A and C free: We can avoid the circulation problem ! And method can apply to the other correlations. Correlation as an example: We take Hong Li et al., APJ 680, 92 (2008)

22

23 For flat universe !

24 With free !

25 For flat universe !

26 The constraints on A and C related with the correlation: i.e., in the literature C is set to [0.89, 1.05]; A is set to 1.5 One can find that, this will lead to the bias to the final constraints on The cosmological parameters!

27 0802.4262: By Nan Liang et al.

28 Take into account the recent weak lensing data: 100 square degree from (the CFHTLS-Wide, RCS, VIRMOS-DESCART and GaBoDS surveys) H.Li et al., e-Print: arXiv:0812.1672

29

30

31

32

33 Testing Oscillating Primordial Spectrum and Oscillating Dark Energy with Astronomical Observations J.Liu, H.Li, J.-Q. Xia & X.Zhang, e-Print: arXiv:0901.2033 This can be motivated by: Natural inflation, Planck scale physics and oscillating primordial spectrum X.L. Wang, et al. Int.J.Mod.Phys.D14:1347,2005

34 The effects on the TT power spectrum and matter power spectrum

35

36 SUMMARY  The current status on determining the cosmological parameters with the data,paying particular attention to the Perturbation of DE;  Cosmological constant fits the current data well  We expect the Future observations like Planck and LAMOST will provide better constraints on the cosmological parameters ! H. Li, J.-Q. Xia, Zu-Hui Fan and X. Zhang, JCAP 10 (2008) 046

37


Download ppt "Determining cosmological parameters with the latest observational data Hong Li TPCSF/IHEP 2009.3.16."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google