1. CARE International And CARE USA “Defending Dignity. Fighting Poverty.” Molly Cunningham

2. CARE takes a holistic view of health and fighting global poverty The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach

3. They focus on Cross-Cutting Initiatives Agriculture & Natural Resources Economic Development EducationEmergency Relief HealthHIV/ AIDS NutritionWater Women’s Empowerment

4. CARE was Founded 1945 as “Cooperative for American Remittances to Europe” “Care Packages”

5. CARE is organized into 12 national sections

6. CARE USA was the first and still is the biggest constituent member 7 member Executive Board 17 member Board of Directors 12 Regional Offices, Headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia Helene D. Gayle MD, MPH- President and CEO, CARE USA

7. Programs depend on local needs CARE International in 87 countries 97% of CI and CUSA employees are nationals Over 1000 different projects worldwide

8. “I am powerful” Campaign Maternal Health Improving access to schools * Microfinancing

10. Finances Revenue CARE USA is the largest: $586 million revenue FY 2009 Total CI revenue FY 2009: $901 million Expenses FY 2009, CARE USA $601 million CI FY 2009, $909 million http://charityreports.bbb.org/national/relief-and-development/care-usa- in-atlanta-ga-119#bbbComments

11. CARE USA Oxfam USA

12. Pros and Cons Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals

13. Pros and Cons Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals ▫2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1)

14. Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals ▫2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) ▫Financial Transparency from 1988-2011

15. Pros and Cons Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals ▫2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) ▫Financial Transparency from 1988-2011

16. Pros and Cons Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals ▫2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) ▫Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 Cons Financing of Administrators?

17. Pros and Cons Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals ▫2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) ▫Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 Cons ▫Financing of Administrators? ▫Corporate Involvement?

18. Pros and Cons Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals ▫2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) ▫Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 Cons ▫Financing of Administators? ▫Corporate Involvement? ▫Possible Data Analysis shortage and selective bias

19. Pros and Cons Pros ▫97% of employees are nationals ▫2012 Top 100 NGOs- CI is #7 (oxfam #3, PIH #2, Wikimedia #1) ▫Financial Transparency from 1988-2011 Cons ▫Financing of Administators? ▫Corporate Involvement? ▫Possible Data Analysis shortage and selective bias

20. References/ credits http://greatnonprofits.org/whitelabel/reviews/care-cooperative-for-assistance-and-relief- everywhere#r_id-91822--user_id-105155http://greatnonprofits.org/whitelabel/reviews/care-cooperative-for-assistance-and-relief- everywhere#r_id-91822--user_id-105155 http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2011/05/01/when-is-humanitarian-aid- inhumane-%E2%80%98the-crisis-caravan%E2%80%99/http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2011/05/01/when-is-humanitarian-aid- inhumane-%E2%80%98the-crisis-caravan%E2%80%99/ http://www.care.org/index.asp http://theglobaljournal.net/article/view/585/ http://www.care-international.org/Media-Releases/care-launches-2010-annual-report.html http://charityreports.bbb.org/national/relief-and-development/care-usa-in-atlanta-ga- 119#bbbCommentshttp://charityreports.bbb.org/national/relief-and-development/care-usa-in-atlanta-ga- 119#bbbComments https://www.msu.edu/unit/phl/devconference/CAREVillSavLoanAfr.pdf http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1653360,00.html http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her131/knutsson.pdf Photos ▫Photos from the Care USA website;; care.org