Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAdele Hancock Modified over 9 years ago
3
2HCl+CaCO 3 HCO 3 - + H + +CaCl 2 HCO 3 - + H + +CaCl 2 CO 2 +H 2 O+CaCl 2 Theoretical Predictions › Used 42.0mL HCl (excess reagent) and 22.0g CaCo 3 › (22.0g CaCO 3 /1) x (1mol CaCO 3 /100.1g CaCo 3 ) x (1mol CO 2 /1mol CaCO 3 )x (22.4L/1mol CO 2 )= 4.9L CO 2 › P= ((.2178moles CO 2 )(.08205atmL/molK)(293K))/(1.2L)= 4.4atm
4
Reaction Vessel Pressure Vessel Troublesome Seals/Excess Pressure Release Connecting Hose Nozzle Angle Adjustment and Support Beam
6
Our car’s design was very hard to have any sort of consistency with due to the added failure points. Although we only had one truly good run (-3in.) we believe our car had the potential to consistently reach this distance if we had fewer design flaws. Improvements (given more time and better materials) would include › Heavier duty seals/sealant › More consistent nozzle › Lighter chassis › Better delivery method for Calcium Carbonate No Kimwipes in delivery method Overall we were satisfied with our one good run although we would have liked to have had more consistency.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.