Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJonah Horton Modified over 9 years ago
1
... for our health Michael Grasmick, PhD WREN Coordinator University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine Taking WREN Surveys: An Uncomplicated, Fast and Rewarding Approach to Contribute to Primary Care Research and Quality Improvement
2
Outline Background Goal Methods Discussion Acknowledgment
3
Surveys Come in a Variety of Flavors Customer Satisfaction Employee Satisfaction For-profit Marketing Non-profit Marketing Event Planning Education Research
4
Some Are Bothersome
5
Some Offer Big Incentives
6
We Want to Appeal to Your Sense of Giving to a Research Endeavor… … and Make You Feel Oh So Good
7
We Struggle with Survey Compliance WREN and WAFP launched surveys are less than reliable ▪ << 80% of target population respond WREN survey compliance has tracked downward over time In a health literacy study: greater compliance with paper vs. e-surveys
8
Goals 1. Develop and retain a group of approximately 200 clinicians that will agree to reliably respond (>80% compliant) to not more than 12 WREN-deployed research or quality improvement surveys. 2. Promote WREN by providing feedback and value to grow our membership.
9
Methods 1. Collaborate with WAFP to find 200 survey takers for one year 2. Validate e-mail addresses and no technical issues (firewalls) to set up for e-survey (Zoomerang) 3. Statistics: Is this group of survey takers generalizable to entire population of WAFP? 4. “Carefully” design surveys: describe purpose and make as simple/short as possible
10
Methods 5. Steering committee approves 12 surveys 6. Deploy survey monthly 7. Track survey compliance 8. Provide feedback at end of each 9. At end of year, ask how to improve
11
Survey the whole or 200 that represent Wisconsin Clinicians? Tom SinsKY Dennis Baumgardner John Beasley Chris Sinsky David Feldstein Jon Temte Kari Lathrop Capul Sarina Schrager Steve Yale Leon Radant David Hahn John Frey
12
Discussion 1. Impediments to survey taking? 2. Perceived value of survey taking? 3. How to add value to you and your practice? 4. Incentives? 5. How to maximize the appeal? 4. Other?
13
Acknowledgements Community-Academic Partnerships core of the University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UW ICTR), funded through an NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA), grant number 1 UL1 RR025011)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.