Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edspace Workshop 2009: The Future for Educational Resource Repositories in a Web.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edspace Workshop 2009: The Future for Educational Resource Repositories in a Web."— Presentation transcript:

1 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edspace Workshop 2009: The Future for Educational Resource Repositories in a Web 2.0 World Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath, UK UKOLN is supported by: This work is licensed under a Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat) Acceptable Use Policy Recording of this talk, taking photos, discussing the content using email, Twitter, blogs, etc. is permitted providing distractions to others is minimised. Acceptable Use Policy Recording of this talk, taking photos, discussing the content using email, Twitter, blogs, etc. is permitted providing distractions to others is minimised. Resources bookmarked using ‘ edspace09 ’ tags http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/edspace-2009/ Email: b.kelly@ukoln.ac.uk Twitter: http://twitter.com/briankelly/ Blog: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/

2 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 2 About Me Brian Kelly: UK Web Focus: a advisory post on Web standards, developments and best practices Involved in Web development since Jan 1993 Promoting innovation and best practices for the Web, including Web 2.0 UKOLN: National centre of expertise in digital information management Funded by JISC and MLA to support the higher/further education communities and the cultural heritage sector Based on University of Bath

3 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 3 Web2MemeMap, Tim O’Reilly, 2005 Characteristics Of Web 2.0 Network as platform Always beta Clean URIs Remix and mash-ups  Syndication (RSS) Architecture of participation  Blogs & wikis  Social networking  Social tagging Trust and openness Benefits of scale Characteristics Of Web 2.0 Network as platform Always beta Clean URIs Remix and mash-ups  Syndication (RSS) Architecture of participation  Blogs & wikis  Social networking  Social tagging Trust and openness Benefits of scale Web 2.0 What Is Web 2.0? Marketing term (derived from observing 'patterns') rather than technical standards - “an attitude not a technology” Web 2.0

4 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Web and Web 2.0 Initially differing perspectives: It’s a trendy marketing term It’s meaningless It’s not a formal technical term … Now: Widely accepted Let’s embrace the term Let’s put higher educational use of Web 2.0 in a historical context 4

5 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 5 JISC Development Approach The JISC Information Environment diagram has a focus on backend provider issues: Establishment of calls Project management guidelines Standards document … Later: E-Framework SUMS Service Genres … IE Technical architecture

6 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 6 My Take (2001) In 2001 in a talk on “The Web In The 21st Century” I suggested that applications could be provided on the network: Bookmarking services Spell-checkers (Word processing applications) What I missed: Commercial provision of such services (I envisaged jisc.ilicio.us!) Mixed economy (I was Old Labour) New business models (Google makes money; we spend money) Local National International

7 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 7 Web 2.0 – It’s Working In brief: It’s attracting users It’s attracting investment It relates to aims of educational sectors and political environment:  Importance of social & informal learning  Encouraging students to become well-informed digital citizens  Allows our rich cultural & scholarly resources to be accessed widely  Public / private collaboration  Avoidance of unnecessary public expenditure In the opening plenary talk at the Umbrella 2007 conference Lynne Brinley highlighted the importance of Web 2.0 to the British Library and encouraged conference delegates to “just do it!”

8 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 8 Opportunities & Challenges The challenges: Getting our audiences back Responding to the wide diversity of applications being developed Responding to the lightweight development tools and approaches being taken The opportunities: Learning from Web 2.0 successes Responding to changes (we’ve been doing this for centuries!) Applying innovative practices appropriately (and not just on top of existing working practices) Slide used at JISC conferences in 2007 & 2009

9 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Getting Our Audience Back 9 If we build it will they come?

10 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Web 2.0 and Edshare Edshare: Embracing a Web 2.0 approach But which aspects? What’s missing? What are the risks? 10

11 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edshare and Web 2.0 Edshare service: provides RSS feeds 11

12 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edshare and Web 2.0 12 Edshare service: provides tag clouds

13 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edshare and Web 2.0 13 Edshare service: provides cool URIS and embedding

14 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edshare and Web 2.0 14 This looks interesting

15 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edshare and Web 2.0 15 D’oh!

16 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 16 Web2MemeMap, Tim O’Reilly, 2005 Characteristics Of Web 2.0 Network as platform Always beta Clean URIs Remix and mash-ups  Syndication (RSS) Architecture of participation  Blogs & wikis  Social networking  Social tagging Trust and openness Benefits of scale Characteristics Of Web 2.0 Network as platform Always beta Clean URIs Remix and mash-ups  Syndication (RSS) Architecture of participation  Blogs & wikis  Social networking  Social tagging Trust and openness Benefits of scale Web 2.0 Another perspective on Web 2.0 It’s not about the technological aspects, it’s about rethinking ownership and use of services and content Web 2.0

17 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 17 The 1 – 9 – 90 Challenge Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute In most online communities, 90% of users are lurkers who never contribute, 9% of users contribute a little, and 1% of users account for almost all the action. (Jakob Neilson, Oct 2006) Potential Benefits: Globalisation Cross-fertilisation Unexpected benefits Maximising impact Potential Dangers: Globalisation Mono-culture Unexpected dangers Loss of impact Remember that Social Web services improve as the numbers of users increase

18 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 18 Why I’m A Fan Slideshare: Easy to upload slides Can be embedded in Web pages Statistics provided More importantly: Annotation facility Slides can be ‘favourited’ I can see my fans, and the other slides they like Amazon style “readers who bought this book also liked these” Would this level of popularity be possible on an institutional or even national repository? http://www.slideshare.net/lisbk/...

19 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Research Influencing Teaching? Note 8,617 views in June 2008 19

20 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 20 Is It Risky? Scenario What happens if a third party provider goes out of business? http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/features/ londoninmaps/exhibition.html http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/features/ londoninmaps/exhibition.html There’s a need for risk assessment, risk management, etc. But this also applies when you are developing software, procuring development work, etc. Application Elsewhere What will happen to our life savings if our bank goes out of business? Do we keep our money under the mattress? And note Guardian headline “Secret List of Universities Facing Collapse”

21 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 21 A Mixed Economy We are likely to have a mixed economy: Systems managed in-house Use of external services We need to ensure these can co-exist and utilise their respective strengths http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2007/06/the_repository_.html “… there is potential for institutions to push out their repository content to other services that have a more up to minute Web interface? This would not need to be a long term commitment and would enable institutions to cater in a more targeted way to their particular 'consumers'. Rachel Heery, UKOLN

22 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 22 A Question “How Can Institutions Develop Innovative and Affordable Tools to Engage Increasingly Sophisticated Audiences” (JISC Digitisation Conf 2007) Some thoughts: In some areas they shouldn’t attempt to compete with market place successes (e.g. Google) If some cases institutions may be indifferent to the service provider (e.g. Microsoft or Google Docs) There are real needs to: Answer the question “Why develop?” Be realistic if development work is funded Be user-focussed (and this isn’t necessarily easy) Be prepared to write off investment if users don’t want what we’ve developed

23 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 23 Being Realistic Options in light of the credit crunch: Let’s build up an empire now which will be embarrassing to close down Let’s use issues of ownership, stability, privacy, … to stifle discussion of 3 rd party solutions Let’s explore a blended approach (a 3 rd way?)

24 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk The pilot was a success … Following a very successful pilot project the JANET Collaborate prototype site will shortly be retired. … This retirement has come about as a result of difficulties in maintaining the prototype beyond its intended lifetime. We are now looking at how to add the functionality into the JANET service portfolio in order to provide an improved feature set based on the requirements gathered in the pilot. We understand that some fans of the prototype site may be disappointed by this news. We apologise for this and at the same time thank all the users of the prototype for their strong, enthusiastic support during the pilot. 24

25 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk … the competition better! Remember Microcosm?! 25

26 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 26 Can We Expect To Compete? We: Focus on the rules May find innovation breaks the rules May encounter ‘job’s worth’ in our institutions They: Have to deliver the goods in order to make money Can be more flexible in interpretting the rules ‘Job’s worths’ won’t to last in innovative companies We: “don’t use trendy technologies like AJAX. We care about blind users and WCAG AA conformance” They: know WCAG approach is flawed; know about ARIA and hybrid accessibility. They will take risks We: “don’t use trendy technologies like AJAX. We care about blind users and WCAG AA conformance” They: know WCAG approach is flawed; know about ARIA and hybrid accessibility. They will take risks

27 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk EU Interoperability Levels The ”European Interoperability Framework for European Public Services 27 Good - but missing users, market forces, economics, … “interoperation rather than interoperability”, Paul Walk

28 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk A Hybrid Approach 28 University of Bath’s OPUS repository

29 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 29 Risk Management JISC infoNet Risk Management infoKit: “In education, as in any other environment, you can’t decide not to take risks: that simply isn’t an option in today’s world. All of us take risks and it’s a question of which risks we take” Examples of people who are likely to be adverse stakeholders: People who fear loss of their jobs People who will require re-training People who may be moved to a different department / team People.. required to commit resources to the project People who fear loss of control over a function or resources People who will have to do their job in a different way People who will have to carry out new or additional functions People who will have to use a new technology

30 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 30 Critical Friends See JISC U&I programme is encouraging establishment of “Critical Friends”

31 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 31 Scenario Planning

32 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 32 Biases Subjective factors Towards a Framework “Time To Stop Doing and Start Thinking: A Framework For Exploiting Web 2.0 Services”, Museums & the Web 2009 conference Intended Purpose Benefits (various stakeholders Risks (various stakeholders Missed Opps. (various stakeholders Costs (various stakeholders Sharing experiences Learning from successes & failures Tackling biases … Critical Friends Application to existing services Application to in-house development …

33 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 33 Using The Framework Intended Purpose Benefits (various stakeholders Risks (various stakeholders Missed Opps. (various stakeholders Costs (various stakeholders Community support Rapid feedback Justify ROI Org. brand Community- building Low? Twitter for individuals Organisational Fb Page Marketing events,… Large audiences Ownership, privacy, lock-in Marketing opportunity Low? Critical Friends UKOLN blogs Email list discussions Learning Many blogs Engaging with a Twitter community Conferences Papers … Note personal biases! Use of approach in two scenarios: use of Twitter & Facebook

34 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 34 Conclusions To conclude: Adding AJAX interfaces, folksonomies, annotation features, etc. to existing may miss out on the benefits that large-scale social networks can provide Remember 1 – 9 – 90 You’ll need to assess the risks of 3 rd party services But this is nothing new The main issues are policy ones, not technical

35 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 35 Conclusions Acknowledgments to Michael Edson for the Web Tech Guy and Angry Staff Person post / comic strip

36 A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk 36 Questions


Download ppt "A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Edspace Workshop 2009: The Future for Educational Resource Repositories in a Web."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google