Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDamon Hudson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Data Lab #6 July 9, 2008 Ivan Katchanovski, Ph.D. POL 242Y-Y
2
Correlation: SPSS Commands SPSS Command: Analyze-Correlate-Bivariate-Pearson Research Hypothesis: The level of economic development has a positive effect on the level of democracy Dataset: World Variables: – Freedom House democracy rating reversed: Dependent variable Interval-ratio – GDP per capita ($1000): Independent variable Interval-ratio 2
3
Example: Interpretation Pearson Correlation Coefficient:.607 – Positive association in expected direction – Strong association Statistical significance SPSS: p(obtained)=.000 <p(critical)=.001=.1% Statistically significant at the.001 or.1% level Research hypothesis: supported by correlation analysis – The level of economic development has a positive and statistically significant effect on the level of democracy 3
4
Scatterplot: Example SPSS commands: Graphs-Interactive-Scatterplot Assign variables: – Vertical axis box: select the dependent variable Freedom House democracy rating reversed – Horizontal axis box: select the independent variable GDP per capita ($1000) – Double click to edit scatterplot Positive association between the economic development level and the democracy level
5
Scatterplot: SPSS Graph Example 5
6
Correlation Matrix Correlation Matrix: correlations of more than 2 variables Example: The Greatest Portuguese vote reliability check – Variables: TV vote, Poll 1, Poll 2 – TV vote is weakly correlated with Poll 1 and Poll 2 – Correlations of TV vote with Poll 1 and Poll 2 are statistically insignificant – Poll 1 and Poll 2 are strongly correlated – Correlation between Poll 1 and Poll 2 is statistically significant at the.05 level TV vote data are not reliable measure of public opinion concerning “Greatest Portuguese” Public opinion polls are reliable measure of public opinion concerning “Greatest Portuguese” 6
7
Greatest Portuguese: SPSS Correlation Matrix TV votePoll No 1Poll No 2 TV votePearson Correlation1.095-.126 Sig. (2-tailed).795.728 N10 Poll No 1Pearson Correlation.0951.698(*) Sig. (2-tailed).795.025 N10 Poll No 2Pearson Correlation-.126.698(*)1 Sig. (2-tailed).728.025 N10 7 * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
8
Correlation Matrix: Table TV votePoll No 1Poll No 2 TV vote 1 Poll No 1.0951 Poll No 2 -.126.698***1 8 Table 1. Correlation Matrix *** Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.