Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byIris Carter Modified over 9 years ago
1
Chromatic Coloring with a Maximum Color Class Bor-Liang Chen Kuo-Ching Huang Chih-Hung Yen* 30 July, 2009
2
Throughout this talk, all graphs considered are finite, undirected, loopless and without multiple edges.
3
Definitions and Notations
4
A proper k-coloring of a graph G is a labeling f : V(G) {1, 2,..., k} such that adjacent vertices have different labels. The labels are colors; the vertices of one color form a color class. Definitions and Notations
5
The chromatic number of a graph G, written χ(G), is the least k such that G has a proper k-coloring. A chromatic coloring of a graph G is a proper coloring of G using χ(G) colors. Definitions and Notations
6
An independent set in a graph is a set of pairwise nonadjacent vertices. The independence number of a graph G, written (G), is the maximum size of an independent set in G. Definitions and Notations
7
An independent set in a graph G is maximum if it has size (G). Any color class S in a proper coloring of a graph G is obviously an independent set. If S is also a maximum independent set in G, then we say that the color class S is maximum. Definitions and Notations
8
Problem
9
We would like to know whether there exists a chromatic coloring of a graph G in which some color class is maximum.
10
Problem We would like to know whether there exists a chromatic coloring of a graph G in which some color class is maximum. However, this cannot be guaranteed if χ(G) (G).
11
A graph G has a chromatic coloring in which some color class is maximum if and only if there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that (G S) = (G) 1.
12
Example χ(G) = 2 < 3 = (G) χ(G S) = 2
13
Example χ(G) = 3 < 4 = (G) χ(G S) = 3
14
Example χ(G) = 4 < 5 = (G) χ(G S) = 4
15
Example χ(G) = 4 < 5 = (G) χ(G S) = 4
16
Main Results Theorem. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then there exists a chromatic coloring of G in which some color class is maximum.
17
Preliminaries
18
Brooks ’ Theorem. (1941) If G is a connected graph other than an odd cycle or a complete graph, then χ(G) (G).
19
Preliminaries Lemma 1. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G), and also let S be a maximum independent set in G. Then (G S) (G) 1 if and only if each component of G S is not an odd cycle when (G) 3 or a complete graph of order (G) when (G) 3.
20
Proof. ( ) It is trivial. ( ) Suppose that (G S) (G) 1. Then (G S) (G). Hence, there must exist one component G i of G S such that (G i ) (G). Since S is a maximum independent set in G, each vertex of V(G) S in G must be adjacent to some vertex of S, and (G) (G S) (G i ). Then, by (G i ) (G) (G) (G i ) and Brooks ’ Theorem, either G i is an odd cycle with (G i ) (G) 3, or G i is a complete graph with |V(G i )| (G i ) (G) 3. This is a contradiction.
21
An odd path-component or an odd cycle-component of a graph G is a component of G isomorphic to an odd path or an odd cycle. A K n -component of G is a component of G isomorphic to a complete graph of order n. If a path P in G is from vertex u to vertex v, then u and v are the endpoints of P. Definitions and Notations
22
Given a nonempty proper subset S of V(G). A (S, S)-chain in G is a path that alternates between vertices in S and vertices in S, where S denotes V(G) S. The set consisting of the neighbors of vertices of S in G is denoted by N G (S). Definitions and Notations
23
Preliminaries Lemma 2. Let G be a connected graph with χ(G) (G) 3. The there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that (G S) 2 χ(G) 1.
24
Proof. By Lemma 1, it suffices to show that there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that G S contains no odd cycle-components. Hence, among all maximum independent sets in G, we let S be one satisfying that G S contains the least number of odd cycle-components, and denote such a number by t. We claim that t 0.
25
Proof. (continued) Suppose otherwise. Then t 1, and we use C to denote some odd cycle-component of G S. Consider any vertex v 1 in C. Then there must exist exactly a vertex w 1 of S adjacent to v 1 in G and (G S) (G) 1 2. Now, let P v 1 w 1 v 2 w 2 be a maximal (S, S)- chain from v 1 in G. Then v i S and w i S for all i 1.
26
Proof. (continued) Furthermore, let r denote the least i such that (1) w i has less than 3 neighbors in G or (2) the two neighbors of w i other than v i in G are not exactly the two endpoints of some odd path- component of G S.
27
(1) If r does not exist, then S G SG S v1v1 u2u2 v2v2 unun vnvn u n+1 v n+1 w1w1 w2w2 wnwn P
28
(1) If r does not exist, then S G SG S v1v1 u2u2 v2v2 unun vnvn u n+1 v n+1 w1w1 w2w2 wnwn P
29
(2) If r exists, then S G SG S v1v1 u2u2 v2v2 urur vrvr ur1ur1 vr1vr1 w1w1 w2w2 wr1wr1 wrwr vr+1vr+1 P
30
S G SG S v1v1 u2u2 v2v2 urur vrvr ur1ur1 vr1vr1 w1w1 w2w2 wr1wr1 wrwr vr+1vr+1 P
31
G SG S v1v1 u2u2 v2v2 urur vrvr ur1ur1 vr1vr1 wrwr
32
Preliminaries Lemma 3. Let G be a connected graph with χ(G) (G) 4. The there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that (G S) (G) 1.
33
Main Results Theorem 4. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that χ(G S) χ(G) 1.
34
Proof. Suppose that G consists of the components G 1, G 2, …, G t, where t 1. It suffices to claim that there exists a maximum independent set S i in each component G i such that χ(G i S i ) χ(G) 1. First, if χ(G i ) χ(G) 1, then any maximum independent set S i in G i has the property that χ(G i S i ) χ(G i ) χ(G) 1. Next, if χ(G i ) χ(G) (G i ), then G i is an odd cycle or a complete graph. Moreover, if χ(G i ) χ(G) (G i ) 2, then G i is a path or an even cycle. In each of these two cases, it is not difficult to find a maximum independent set S i in G i such that χ(G i S i ) χ(G i ) 1 χ(G) 1. Finally, if χ(G i ) χ(G) (G i ) 3, then there exists a maximum independent set S i in G i such that χ(G i S i ) χ(G i ) 1 χ(G) 1 by Lemmas 2 and 3.
35
Main Results Corollary 5. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then there exists a chromatic coloring of G in which some color class is maximum.
36
Let χ max (G) denote the least k such that a graph G has a proper k-coloring in which some color class is maximum. Definitions and Notations
37
Main Results Proposition 6. χ(G) χ max (G) χ(G) + 1 for any graph G.
38
Proof. Let S be a maximum independent set in G. Since G S is a subgraph of G, we have χ(G S) χ(G). Then it is easy to obtain that χ max (G) χ(G S) + 1 χ(G) + 1 by adding the additional color class S to a chromatic coloring of G S. Besides, it is trivial that χ max (G) χ(G).
39
Main Results Corollary 7. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then χ max (G) χ(G).
40
Main Results Corollary 8. If G is a connected graph other than an odd cycle or a complete graph, then χ max (G) (G).
41
Proof. By Brooks ’ Theorem, we have χ(G) (G). If χ(G) (G) 1, then χ max (G) χ(G) + 1 ( (G) 1) + 1 (G). If χ(G) (G), then χ max (G) χ(G) (G) by Corollary 7. Hence, the assertion holds.
42
Main Results Theorem 9. A graph G with (G) 3 χ(G) is equitably 3-colorable if and only if one of the following statements holds: 1. no components of G or at least two components of G are K 3,3 ; 2. (G K 3,3 ) | V (G K 3,3 ) | / 3.
43
Thank you for your attention!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.