Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCaitlin Brooks Modified over 8 years ago
1
Framework for Expenditure Assignment Decentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Reform 24 March 2003 Dana Weist PRMPS
2
Design Determines Impact Expenditures = government services Design affects availability, quality, access and appropriate use of public services e.g. health, education, water, roads etc. Can ultimately affect macroeconomic stability
3
Macroeconomic Stability Key factor is “ hard budget constraint ” Creates incentives for subnational fiscal discipline Limits risk of central government Can be “ softened ” through several channels (intergovernmental fiscal system, financial system, SOEs etc.)
4
Equity Extent of fiscal equalization Ways and means for targeting poor places and poor people
5
Efficiency Considerations for assignment: public goods, externalities, subsidiarity, economies of scale, public sector competition Do local services respond to local needs? –Do citizens have meaningful opportunities for voice? –Do officials face incentives to respond?
6
Common Problems Unclear delineation between public and private sectors Lack of formal assignment Concurrent assignment among levels of government No mechanisms for coordination and conflict resolution Inefficient assignments
7
Decentralization of Functions Organization Planning Personnel Infrastructure Resources Regulation
8
Poverty Reduction Strategies Elements of a successful anti-poverty strategy Identify the poor Understand reasons and factors that lead to poverty Design a set of policies (e.g. PRS) Cost-effective implementation Fiscal decentralization as a key to policy design and effectiveness
9
Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) Proximity to target group Identify beneficiaries and willingness to pay Distribution policy becomes intergovernmental Economies of place
10
Poverty Reduction Roles Policy interventions in a unitary system Multi-level fiscal systems Fiscal decentralization and service delivery Intergovernmental transfers Local participation and accountability
11
Key Points Ultimately, no single best assignment Ideally, services should be provided at lowest level of government where benefits lie Public provision doesn ’ t imply public production Clarity is critically important
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.