1. Opponent paper

2. Relevance and pick of countries Iraq – England Two different cultures Typical Middle Eastern and European country

3. Models and methods Good and relevant models Good comparison

4. Alternative models Gert Hofstedes triangle

5. Richard Gesteland cross-cultural business- behaviour

6. Documentation and sufficiency They compare the religion very well But they could have focused on some more points (Sport – Weddings). They don’t show where their sources are from

7. Analysis and argumentation The use of theories is good and relevant – they compare the countries very well They could have make the comparison of religion for example on the same page.

8. Cultural aspects They don’t tell much about general culture For example sports and food culture.

9. Systematics and clarify of the language Good sources The speaker is loud and clear in his voice – but speaks very fast at some points.