1. 1 BETA-DELAYED NEUTRON SPECTROSCOPY OF 51,52,53,(54) Ca A. Gottardo, R. Grzywacz, M. Madurga ISOLDE Workshop2015

2. 2 Why beta-delayed neutron spectroscopy ? Spectroscopy of particle-hole states GT decays and 2n emission The past studies: 51-53 K -> 51-53 Ca Preliminary results

3. 3 In exotic nuclei close to shell closures we can have very large Q values (10 MeV or more) The beta decay can thus populate states below and above the neutron (and 2n) separation threshold Where does the beta strenght go through(GT, FF) and to ? Particle-hole to measure the shell energies in exotic nuclei Example:

4. 4 Test the evolution of ESPEs ν f 7/2, ν p 3/2, ν p 1/2, G. Hagen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 032502 (2012) Different prediction going towards the N=34 for the f 7/2 gap (different renormalization of 3N forces + coupling to continuum) J. D. Holt et al., PRC 90, 024312 (2014)

5. 5 D. Steppenbeck et al., Nature 502, 207 (2013) F. Wienholtz et al., Nature 498, 346 (2013) 54 Ca : the 2 + energy and the mass indicate a subshell closure 53 Ca : understanding single- particle energies going towards N=34: ν p 1/2 – ν f 5/2 gap

6. 6 The lowering of the 2n threshold in 53 K should make the GT almost all go through 2n emission: need to measure 2 neutrons. FF should go through 1n or γ emission Courtesy of R. Grzywacz

7. 7 Not enough statistics for 52,53 Ca 51 K 53 K 52 K

8. 8 VANDLE neutron array: ε: 10 %; σ: 80 keV (1 MeV) Two - four clovers High-efficiency beta detector (>80 %) IDS tape 1 LaBr (Mr. Big) Low rates

9. 9 γ IDS- VANDLE 2653 3150 1961 3387 1427 SE 2563 DE 2563 1027 1718 2377 2934 34603500 52 Ca 51 Ca 50 Ca 10 3 Energy (keV) Partial statistics !

10. 10 NEUTRONS VANDLE Partial statistics !

11. 11 Neutron TOF γ energy 51 Ca 50 Ca 1718 2377 2934 34603500 52 Ca 2653 1027 Partial statistics !

12. 12 2563 3150 SE 2563 2220 γ IDS – VANDLE γ TONNERE 52 Ca 53 Ca

13. 13 Neutrons VANDLE ( ½ stat) TOF Energy Neutrons VANDLE ( ½ stat)

14. 14 Neutron TOF γ energy 52 Ca 2563 3150

15. 15 D. Steppenbeck et al., Nature 502, 207 (2013) γ IDS – VANDLE Q-value 20 MeV !

16. 16 Result from neutrons: M. Langevin et al., PLB 130, 251 (1983) T ½ = 10(5) ms Our result from gamma rays 53K 54K New proposal for dedicated experiment !

17. 17 Successful production of very exotic K isotopes, even if rates lower than expected Excellent performance of the experimental setup: Ge detectors, VANDLE, improved IDS Statistics should allow one to contruct the level scheme of 53 Ca 2n decay channel under study in 52,53 Ca

18. 18 A. Gottardo 1, R. Grzywacz 2, M. Madurga 3, G. de Angelis 4, G. Benzoni 6,M. Borge 3, A. Boso 5, S. Franchoo 1, S. Go 2,K. Kolos 2, M. Kowalska 3, S. Ilyushkin 9, Y. Xiao 2, R. Li 1, I. Matea 1, D.Mengoni 5, A.I. Morales 6, S. Paulauskas 10, S. Roccia 8, C. Sotty 7, S. Taylor 2, D. Verney 1, H. de Witte 7, A. Negret 13, N. Marginean 13, R. Lica 13, C. Mihai 13, R.E. Mihai 13, R. Marginean 13, C. Costache 13, S. Nae 13, A. Turturica 13, B. Dimitrov 3, T. Cap 14, O. Tongbles, I. Martel 15, C. Gross 2, A. Perea 16, C. Mazzocchi 14, M. Piersa 14, B. Gowsalves 3, L. Fraile 16. And the IDS and ISOLDE collaboration 1 Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, 2 University of Tennessee, 3 CERN, 4 INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, 5 University of Padova and INFN Padova, 6 University of Milano and INFN Milano, 7 KU Leuven, 8 CSNSM Orsay, 9 Colorado School of Mines, 10 NSCL, 11 IFIC Valencia, 13 IFIN-HH, Bucharest, 14 Warsaw Univesity, 15 Huelva Univesity 16 Unversidad Autonoma Madrid/CSIC

19. Experimental setup: rates 1n efficiency2n efficiency γ efficiency 10 %~ 0.1 %~ 2 % 51 K 52 K 53 K Production rates32000 pps3000 pps50 pps Counts (1n) 5.67·10 7 1.35·10 7 5·10 5 Counts (2n)? 3.2·10 4 7·10 3

20. Beam-time summary 51 K 52 K 53 K 54 K Beam time (shifts) 34123 In total, 22 shifts (seven days) were requested and assigned Actually... Only half of them exploited rates 1/20 of what was expected !!! BUT...

21. 54 K -> 54 Ca: worth a try ! 54 K Production rate1 pps Counts γ (10 % population) 150 Challange: producion rate never really observed: ≤ 1 pps. We suppose only 10% population of the bound excited states (2 + )

22. GT decay and 2n emission (1) GT strength distribution: exp. Matrix elements are much smaller than predicted by theory: GT strength was probably partially missed because it is going through 2n emission GT strength distribution: exp. Matrix elements are much smaller than predicted by theory: GT strength was probably partially missed because it is going through 2n emission Energy (MeV) 51 Ca Exp. Distribution 51 Ca GXPF1A Distribution With VANDLE we hope to see the 2n emission in 51 Ca, 52-53 Ca and identify the GT strength Shell-model calculation with chiral 3-body forces have already shown the presence of a 2-body GT operator: different renormalization of the GT strength J. Menendez et al., PRL 107, 062501 (2011) Courtesy of R. Grzywacz