Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Indianapolis v. St. Petersburg Why do their policing styles differ? Article: “Police Culture and Coercion”, Criminology, 41:4, 2003.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Indianapolis v. St. Petersburg Why do their policing styles differ? Article: “Police Culture and Coercion”, Criminology, 41:4, 2003."— Presentation transcript:

1 Indianapolis v. St. Petersburg Why do their policing styles differ? Article: “Police Culture and Coercion”, Criminology, 41:4, 2003

2 FBI UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS – 2003 – NUMBER OF OFFENSES KNOWN TO POLICE http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03cius.htm PopulationTT ViolentMurderRapeRobbAggAsltTT PropBurgTheftVehTheft Indianapolis 8001677069107420282837144538610062278917433 St. Petersburg 25309540542210611982728164313852105831996 Ind:St.P ratio 3.2:11.7:14.9:14:12.4:11.4:12.8:12.6:1 3.7:1 DEMOGRAPHICS – 2000 CENSUS http://encyclopedia.learnthis.info/i/in/indianapolis__indiana.html http://www.answers.com/topic/saint-petersburg-florida Area (mi 2 )Pop dens./ mi 2 % Pop. < 25 Indianapolis 362216336% St. Petersburg 133416329% Ind:St.P ratio 2.7:10.5:11.2:1 (21%>) POLICE FORCE CHARACTERISTICS www.policepay.net Ofcs (w/o supv)Ofc/1,000 pop. Indianapolis 9541.2 St. Petersburg 4321.7 Ind:St.P ratio 2.2:10.7:1 (29%<)

3 Indianapolis – St. Petersburg comparison (racial profiling article) Differences between communities – Crime – Police coverage – Population density – Geographical area Effects of differences on environment of policing – Officer backup / number on scene – Response time – Officer safety – Crime solving – Pressures to move on (calls waiting) Can these explain differences in policing styles between areas? – Indianapolis: impersonal “traditional” approach – St. Petersburg: personalized “community” approach Individual differences in policing styles within agencies remains – How officers target motorists does vary

4 Politics  Agency approach (traditional-professional OR community-oriented)  Officer styles (crime fighter OR service oriented)  Use of force, coercion, profiling Environmental forces  Agency approach (traditional-professional OR community-oriented)  Officer styles (crime fighter OR service oriented)  Use of force, coercion, profiling Are agencies and officers free to “choose” their approaches and styles? This...? Or this?

5 Officer styles (crime fighter OR service oriented) Environmental forces Agency approach (traditional-professional OR community-oriented) Use of force, coercion, profiling PoliticsEducatorsFunding Sources Individual factors Or is the model even more complex?


Download ppt "Indianapolis v. St. Petersburg Why do their policing styles differ? Article: “Police Culture and Coercion”, Criminology, 41:4, 2003."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google