1. The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures June 14, 2005

2. Slide 2 ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR: FINANCIAL RESOURCES AVAILABILITY Financial resources are available to foster student access and success –Core Measures Measure 2A – State and local appropriations per FYE Measure 2B – Private gifts, grants and contracts revenue relative to tuition and appropriations –Context Core measures for similar public institutions Total revenue per FYE Revenue sources as percent of total revenue

3. Slide 3 MEASURE 2A AND 2B DATA SOURCES Operating and non-operating revenue by source –National Center for Education Statistics: IPEDS Finance Survey FY 2003 is first year of reporting under new GASB 34/35 standards –National Center for Education Statistics: IPEDS Enrollment Survey Credit hours generated

4. Slide 4 MEASURE 2A: STATE AND LOCAL APPROPRIATIONS DEFINITIONS Numerator: Total state and local appropriations –State appropriations: Amounts received through acts of a state legislative body for current operating expenses –Local appropriations: Amounts received from property or other taxes assessed by or for an institution below the state level. Denominator: Total Full Year Equivalent enrollment (FYE) –Student credit hours divided by full-time load

5. Slide 5 MEASURE 2B: PRIVATE GIFTS, GRANTS & CONTRACTS REVENUE - DEFINITIONS Numerator: Total revenue from private gifts, grants and contracts –Private gifts: Revenues from private donors for which no legal consideration is provided. –Grants and Contracts: Revenues from government agencies and local/private organizations that are for specific projects or programs and that are classified as operating revenues. Denominator –For Measure 2B-2: Revenue from tuition, fees and state and local appropriations.

6. Slide 6 Figure 2A STATE AND LOCAL APPROPRIATIONS PER FYE: FY 2003

7. Slide 7 Figure 2B-2 PRIVATE GIFT, GRANT & CONTRACT REVENUE PER $100 OF APPROPRIATIONS, TUITION & FEES: FY 2003

8. Slide 8 CONTEXT: REVENUE SOURCES AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL OPERATING AND NON-OPERATING REVENUE FY 2003

9. Slide 9 ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR: PLANNING AND RESOURCE ALIGNMENT The system is engaged in effective planning, collaboration, and resource decision-making –Core Measure: Course Transfer Percentage of college-level credits earned at a system institution that are accepted in transfer by a receiving system institution. –Context Percentage of credits accepted in transfer reported in four studies from other states

10. Slide 10 MEASURE 5B: COURSE TRANSFER DEFINITIONS Percent Accepted: Credits accepted in transfer divided by Sending Credits. –Numerator: Credits Accepted: Total credits accepted in transfer at the receiving institution. –Denominator: Sending Credits: Total college-level credits earned at the sending institution, including credits from courses with “D” grade. Cohort: Undergraduate students enrolling and transferring in one or more credits from a System institution to another System institution during a fiscal year. Timeframe: Reported for students transferring in to System institutions during Fiscal Years 2002 & 2003.

11. Slide 11 Figure 5B-1 PERCENT CREDITS ACCPETED IN TRANSFER: SYSTEM SUMMARY

12. Slide 12 Figure 5B-2 PERCENT CREDITS ACCPETED TRANSFER BY RECEIVING SECTOR

13. Slide 13 Figure 5B-1 PERCENT CREDITS ACCPETED IN TRANSFER: CONTEXT

14. Slide 14 REASONS COURSES ARE NOT ACCEPTED IN TRANSFER Courses that do not apply to the student’s program or major at the receiving institution: –Student changed program or major –Student has more credits than are needed for the program or major Courses with a grade of “D” are often not accepted if the student’s GPA is below 2.0. Courses that were in progress or were taken after the student submitted the transcript. Courses that were taken more than once.

15. Slide 15 REASONS COURSES WERE NOT ACCEPTED IN TRANSFER Source: Review of selected transcripts

16. Slide 16 DASHBOARD DEMONSTRATION System Data Warehouse - Oracle 8i Brio Intelligence Hyperion Dashboard Software Dashboard Demonstration

17. Slide 17 NEXT STEPS Human resource measures Student engagement and satisfaction measures Dashboard development Updating existing measures