Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVivien Lindsey Modified over 8 years ago
1
Dave Mengel, Kansas State University Multi-State Winter Wheat Sensor Project, 2009-10
2
Participants Kansas: Dave Mengel, Kent Martin, Doug Shoup Oklahoma: Bill Raun, Brian Arnall Missouri: Peter Scharf Ohio: Robert Mullin Virginia: Wade Thomasson Maryland: Josh McGrath Others expressed interest but were not able to participate this past year.
3
Objectives Conduct a common experiment across a broad range of conditions to: Evaluate sensor performance at predicting N fertilizer needs Generate a common data set to assist in algorithm development Develop a community of individuals interested in using sensors to enhance yield and NUE in wheat
4
The Experiment Randomized complete block design, four reps, eight common treatments: No N control, Reference strip, six rates of topdress N 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 all with 25 applied at seeding. Most topdress rates applied a F 4/5. Where multiple topdress rates were used, first applied as a uniform rate and treatments were applied at the second topdressing. NDVI measurements made at several times, but most focused on green-up through jointing. All participants used GreenSeeker, some used additional sensors. All participants measured yield, TW and grain N.
5
The Experiment cont. Most participants added additional treatments. These included: Different types of reference strips, or times of reference strip application Additional times of N application Multiple topdressings Single topdressings at later dates Feekes 7 or 9 Additional sensors or measurements
6
Preliminary Results Results are not in from all sites Good range of yields and N response Sensors appeared to be able to detect differences in N needs at Feekes 4 /5 (and at later growth stages) Appeared to be significant N loss after sensing at some sites, based on differences between Reference and TD tmt yields
7
Results: Kansas Locations Yates Center North Farm McPher East McPher West Garden City Stanton NDVI, ref, F4/50.550.720.570.660.540.51 RI1.421.251.12 1.00 Yld potential, ref568058755650 Yld observed, ref435650726467 Topdress N rec5452212600 Yld rec N rate334930686571 Opt td N obs5012575 00 Yld obs, opt td N335855726571
8
Results: Other Locations VTOSU Lahom OSU Henn OSU LCB NDVI, ref, F4/50.790.550.780.79 RI1.271.311.161.11 Yld potential, ref635770 Yld observed, ref74374160 Topdress N rec57453323 Yld rec N rate74384050 Opt td N rate obs10050 0 Yld obs, opt td N86385355
9
Proposed activity for 2010-2011 Continue project for second year Use the same basic design: True control Reference Strip Topdress N applications applied on top of “Farmer Practice” fall or fall/spring application Kansas will apply 25 pounds N in the fall with P at seeding Six topdress rates, 0-125 pounds N per acre applied F4/5, F7, F9, what ever is appropriate in your area Sensor measurements at time of application
10
All are invited to participate If you are interested, please contact me at: dmengel@ksu.edu 785-532-2166
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.