1. SDQD Study Substructure, Science Center, and Pool Building Demolition and Quadrangle Development SDQD

2. Campus and Substructure Timeline 1974 Columbia Point campus opened Substructure concrete began Failing 1980s 2005 DCAMM/SGH Study on Substructure and existing buildings Decision to demolish and create Master Plan 2006 2015-2016 SDQD Study with DCAMM 2006-present Substructure Stabilization for interim period Utility Corridor and Roadway Relocation 2013-2017 SDQD Enabling Projects 2015-20?? 20?? SDQD Project Design and Construction

3. Master Plan 2015 Update

4. Substructure Demolition Decision Why Demolish the Substructure, Science Center, and Pool? Long-term structural concerns Failing Utilities Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing systems past their “useful life” Required investments exceed replacement costs Utility Corridor does not supply new utilities to Science Center & Pool Opportunity to transform campus, connect to waterfront

5. Campus Center Wheatley McCormack Healey ISC Quinn S&S Clark Pool Science University Hall GAB2 Site Archives EMKI CPPS Energy Producing Facility Site Plaza SDQD Approximate Demolition Scope

6. SUBSTRUCTURE DEMOLITION Campus Continuity ENABLING PROJECTS – What needs to happen first? Emergency Evacuation & Access Circulation Pedestrian (catwalk, plaza, etc.) Service & Loading UCRR: Utility Corridor and Roadway Relocation Project Science Center Program Relocation (multiple projects) Pool Building Relocation Construction Access OVERARCHING CONSIDERATIONS: MAINTAINING DAY-TO-DAY CAMPUS OPERATIONS, ACADEMIC CONTINUITY, & PUBLIC SAFETY

7. Demolition Scenario Planning DISTURBANCECOSTTIME Demolition sequence Schedule duration Campus calendar Price tag Maintenance of material Relocation of Program Campus operations Academic setting Vibration, noise, dust Temporary projects Program/space Circulation Impact on neighbors

8. Existing Campus Conditions CampusCenter WheatleyMcCormack HealeyISC Quinn S&S Clark Pool Science Center

9. Future Campus Post-Demolition CampusCenter WheatleyMcCormack HealeyISC Quinn S&S Clark FUTURE QUAD

10. Two General Approaches to Demolition 1. “Sequential Demolition” -One area at a time, in sequence -Less noisy, less vibrations, less dust, more time 2. “Expedited Demolition” -Multiple demolition crews -Louder, dustier, more vibrations -Less time, “ripping the band-aid off” Demolition Strategies

11. Sequential Demolition Demolition Strategies

18. Expedited Demolition Demolition Strategies

23. SDQD Thought Provoking Questions Focused View What might the impact be to your role and the functions of your units? 1.How will you get to your building and office? 2.Where do you travel throughout the day? 3.How will students, faculty, or staff visit you? How will you visit them? 4.How will you continue to carry out your role/services?

24. SDQD Discussion Questions Small Group Discussion 1.What circulation cannot change and must be accommodated? 2.What functions are most directly impacted by demolition? 3.What key adjacencies exist that might be impacted? 4.When would this work have the biggest or smallest impact? (time of day/year) 5.Which demolition approach would be more tolerable? Sequential or Expedited? Each group should have a facilitator and identify a scribe to take notes