1. 1 11 Mid Day Meal Scheme Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – NAGALAND on 07.05.2010

2. 2 Review of Implementation of MDMS in NAGALAND (Primary + Upper Primary) (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009) Part-I Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. 33 No. of Schools Covered (PY + UP.PY) 90% Coverage Ref: Table 2, 2.1, 2.2, Fact Sheet 60% Coverage Total Coverage 80%

4. 4 PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of Working days Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 80%100%77% Ref: Table 1.2, Fact Sheet

5. 5 5 PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3) 91% Covered 117% Covered 99% Ref: Table 1.1, Fact Sheet

6. 6 6 PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Meals in Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of Meal (in Crore) 100%80% 77% 100% 80%76% PRIMARYUPPER PRIMARY Total Meals served 77% Ref: Table 1.5, Fact Sheet

7. 7 Food Grains Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Foodgrains (in MTs) 80% benchmark 63% 100% Ref: Table 4, Fact Sheet

8. 8 8 Food grains lifting Month-wise(Q1+Q2+Q3)[FCI BIILS] Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Including Unspent balance Ref: Table 4.4, Fact Sheet

9. 9 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Cooking Cost Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) 80% benchmark 78% 100% Ref: Table 5, Fact Sheet

10. 10 Mismatch of no of meals served, Cooking Cost utilised & Foodgrains utilised (Q1+Q2+Q3) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. 11 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India MME Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) 100% Ref: Table 6, Fact Sheet 50%

12. 12 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) 100% Ref: Table 7, Fact Sheet 50%

13. 13 Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Sheds) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 100% utilisation of Physical 100% utilisation of Financial Ref: Table 8.3, Fact Sheet

14. 14 Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Devices) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 100% utilisation of Physical 100% utilisation of Financial Ref: Table 8.6, Fact Sheet

15. 15 Performance Score card 2009-2010 SlComponentPerformanceBenchmark 1. No of Schools covered under MDM80%100% 2. No of Children (PY+ UP.PY)99%100% 3. No of Working Days77%80% 5. Foodgrains Utilisation63%80% 6. Cooking Cost Utilisation78%80% 7. Meals Served77%80% 8. MME Utilisation50%75% 9. Transport Assistance50%75% 10. Kitchen Shed construction100% 11. Kitchen Devices procurement100% 12. QPRs3 nos.

16. 16 Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-11 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. 17 Time Series No of Children (PRIMARY) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 99% 100% Ref: Table 9, Fact Sheet * Govt+Govt aided *

18. 18 No of Children (PRIMARY) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India DISE 08-09PAB Approval 09-10PROPOSAL2010-11AVAILEDMDMOPTED MDM Ref: Table 9, Fact Sheet * Govt+Govt aided *

19. 19 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Time Series No of Children (UPPER PRIMARY) 124%125% Ref: Table 10, Fact Sheet * Govt+Govt aided *

20. 20 No of Children (UPPER PRIMARY) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India DISE 08-09PAB Approval09-10PROPOSAL2010-11AVAILEDMDMOPTED MDM Ref: Table 10, Fact Sheet * Govt+Govt aided *

21. 21 No. of School days NoSource of DataNo of Days 1 DISE 2008-09 183 2 MDM approval (09-10) 200 3 Benchmark(Q1+Q2+Q3) 160 4 Performance(Q1+Q2+Q3) 155 5 State Proposal 220 Ref: Table 10, Fact Sheet

22. 22 Proposal for Kitchen Cum Stores NoItemNo. 1 Total No. of Institutions * 2223 2 Total Sanctioned (06-10) 1777 3 Constructed through convergence --- 4 Gap 446 5 State Proposal ( 2010-11) 446 * Govt + Govt aided Schools

23. 23 Proposal for Kitchen Devices NoItemNo. 1 Total No. of Institutions 2751 2 Total Sanctioned (06-10) 2210 3 Convergence - 4 Gap 541 5 State Proposal ( 2010-11 ) 541

24. 24 No. of Cook-cum-helpers NoItemNo. 1 No. of Institutions 2751 2 Already Sanctioned ( Dec 09- March 10) 1903 3 Already Working (09-10) 1903 4 Additional requirement 3831 5 Total requirement(3+4) 5734

25. 25 Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India