1. Project 4: hydrologic subsystems in hillslopes What are the key controls on and the key interactions between the soil, ecology, geomorphology and biogeochemistry that create hydrologic storages and flow- paths and partition incoming water into them? What role do these storages and flow-paths have in maintaining the regimes of soil, ecology, geomorphology and biogeochemistry, particularly with respect to the temporal variability imposed by the climate? Can an organizing principle be identified that could drive the evolution of the hydrologic system in a hillslope?

2. Project activities Organize a series of workshops (1 each year, so 4 in total) Workshops are run by core group of people with different background (hydrology (McDonnell/Troch), biogeochemistry (Brooks), soil sciences (Rasmussen/Chorover), ecology (Huxman)) Each year, a workshop is held at a different research site –Year 1: B2 Earth Sciences (November 18-19, 2007) –Year 2: H.J. Andrews/Panola/Shale Hills (?) –Year 3: Valles Caldera/Catalinas-Santa Rita/Sierra (?) –Year 4: Synthesis at B2-Earth Sciences Number of participants: <30 Output: 2-pager that is distributed to larger hydrologic community Follow-up: special session at AGU meeting Synthesis papers

3. B2 Earthscience Experimental Biome

4. B2 Earthscience Initial Focus How does water move through a hillslope and what role does life play? Biosphere 2 provides controlled experimentation at spatial scales that have the complexity of real landscapes Test hypotheses Validate models Observe emergent properties

5. Research questions (Praveen Kumar) How do hillslope/landscape "connectivity" patterns "emerge" and evolve and what are the time-scales associated with these? The patterns of connectivity are interpreted broadly to include channels, heterogeneity of flow paths, vegetation, subsurface flow, etc. How is heterogeneity related to connectivity and how does connectivity give rise to threshold response - that is, what is the relationship between the static properties of hillslopes to the dynamic response? Is the emergence and evolution of self-organized connectivity a result of some global optimality (of some objective function) or local interactions? What is the relationship between variability of the driver (rainfall) and the emergence of connectivity? Do the connectivity patterns change with variability of rainfall, if so, in what way? How do the above change with the spatial and temporal scales?

6. © Oregon State University Hillslope Hydrology Challenges Artificial hillslopes can have realness Markus Weiler, (ETH Zurich) Over time we can see how these effects evolve

7. © Oregon State University Hillslope Hydrology Challenges They can have realistic surface and subsurface topography Depth Min 0.0 m Max 1.86 m Average 0.63 m Volume 510 m 3 (  0.55) Scale 2 m gridscale McDonnell et al., 1996 EOS Correlation length scales for soil depth distributions published to date are in a rather narrow range of 4-20 m

8. © Oregon State University Hillslope Hydrology Challenges For solving the double paradox puzzle McGuire et al., 2005 WRR

9. © Oregon State University Hillslope Hydrology Challenges   0   <0 Stream For solving the two water worlds puzzle Brooks et al., 2007 IAEA Publ.

10. © Oregon State University Hillslope Hydrology Challenges For solving puzzles of when chemistry trumps hydrology and vice versa …what is retained, what is produced, what is flushed Van Verseveld et al., 2007 JGR Biogeo., in review Or?

11. © Oregon State University Hillslope Hydrology Challenges For puzzles of transpiration patterns  13 C leaf sugars & phloem, LAI, sap flow, pre- dawn water potential  13 CO 2 of soil respiration, soil CO 2 efflux, soil moist & temp. Barnard et al., in prep

12. © Oregon State University Hillslope Hydrology Challenges For examining how input patterns conspire with subsurface networks and threshold response Keim et al. JoH 2006 050m100m (mm)