Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEvangeline Riley Modified over 8 years ago
1
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Lee WC, Lee CK, Leung AK, Hutchins SW. Is it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non–weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):459–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049JSP Is it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non–weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses? Winson C. C. Lee, PhD; Christina K. L. Lee, MPhil; Aaron K. L. Leung, PhD; Stephen W. Hutchins, PhD
2
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Lee WC, Lee CK, Leung AK, Hutchins SW. Is it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non–weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):459–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049JSP Aim – Reveal whether foot shape changed in molds taken with the subtalar joint at different orientations. Relevance – This study may provide useful information regarding non–weight-bearing foot molding techniques for the field of foot orthotics.
3
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Lee WC, Lee CK, Leung AK, Hutchins SW. Is it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non–weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):459–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049JSP Methods During non–weight-bearing casting, subtalar joints were aligned at following positions: – 4° of eversion. – 2° of eversion. – 2° of inversion. – Neutral. At each orientation, forces were applied over forefoot so metatarsal heads were aligned with rearfoot. Digital scanning was used to analyze shape of each negative mold.
4
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Lee WC, Lee CK, Leung AK, Hutchins SW. Is it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non–weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):459–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049JSP Results Projection volume changed significantly with different subtalar joint orientations. Changes in arch heights, navicular height, and protrusion were insignificant and very small.
5
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Lee WC, Lee CK, Leung AK, Hutchins SW. Is it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non–weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):459–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0049JSP Conclusions As long as forefoot and hindfoot are aligned, variations in orientation of subtalar joint do not significantly change plantar foot shape of positive model.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.