Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBasil Blankenship Modified over 9 years ago
1
Transportation Improvement Board Urban Funding Opportunities June 2010
2
Workshop Agenda Introductions Funding Program Overview Program Criteria How to Apply Strategies for Success
3
Program Intent Urban Arterial Program Reduce congestion and improve safety Urban Sidewalk Program Enhance pedestrian safety, mobility and connectivity of system
4
Selection Criteria CriteriaUAPSP Safety45 Mobility20 Pavement Condition15 Sustainability1510 Local Support510 Growth & Development Pedestrian Access35 Total100
5
Historical Cutoffs FY 2004-2010 Ratings RegionUAPSP East61 - 76 West63 - 83 Puget Sound61 - 7670 - 82 Northwest49 - 66 Northeast49 - 62 Southeast52 - 67 Southwest53 - 66
6
Program Regions UAP Program 5 regions Sidewalk Programs 3 Regions
7
Target Program Sizes Urban Arterial Program UAP $38 Million Sidewalk Program - SP $1.0 Million
8
Funding Program Timeline
9
Urban Arterial Program Requirements Eligible Agencies Eligible Routes Local Match Agency Comprehensive Plan WSDOT Concurrence (if applicable) Sidewalk Deviation to Policy
10
UAP Typical Work Design Phase Design Environmental, Cultural Resource & VE Studies Right of Way Construction Phase Construction Engineering Construction Contract Construction Other
11
UAP Criteria Safety45 points Mobility20 points Pavement Condition15 points Sustainability15 points Local Support 5 points Total100 points
12
Safety45 points Correctable Accidents Correctable Safety Hazards Access Control Eliminate Existing At-Grade Crossing
13
Mobility20 points Capacity Improvement Truck Route T-1 to T-3 Traffic Signal Interconnect Network Development Peak Hour Buses Access Improvements
14
Pavement Condition15 points Visual Inspection of Existing Pavement New Route Rehabilitation Project Sidewalk Condition
15
Sustainability 15 points Adopted Greenhouse Gas Emissions Policy Modal Measures Energy Measures Environmental Measures Recycling Measures
16
Local Support5 points Local Match Previously Completed Work
17
Competitive UAP Project
18
Non-Competitive UAP Project
19
Sidewalk Program Requirements Eligible Agencies Minimum Local Match Federally Classified Urban Route Consistent with agency comprehensive plan WSDOT concurrence (if applicable)
20
USP Typical Work Design Phase Design Environmental and Cultural Surveys Construction Phase Construction Contract Sidewalk Construction (one or both sides) Other Project Work Ineligible Work
21
USP Criteria Pedestrian Safety45 points Pedestrian Access35 points Local Support10 points Sustainability10 points Total 100 points
22
Pedestrian Safety45 points Existing Conditions Accident History Existing Hazards
23
Pedestrian Access35 points Direct Access Indirect Access Network Development
24
Local Support10 points Community Impact Local Match
25
Sustainability 10 points
26
Competitive USP Project
27
Non-Competitive USP Project
28
TIB Applications Download from TIB Website Submit Signed Original Postmarked by August 31, 2010
29
Tips For Success Self Score and Compare to Historical Cutoff Start Early Contact your TIB Engineer for Assistance Answer All Questions Include All Attachments Signed Application postmarked by Aug 31, 2010
30
Application Not Funded… AGENCY
31
Project Selection Board selects projects at Nov 19, 2010 meeting Results posted after the meeting on TIB website at www.tib.wa.gov TIB notifies all agencies of project selection or non-selection
32
Funded Project - Now What? TIB funds available after required paperwork is returned to TIB Project Timeline is Critical Executive Order 05-05 Submit Timely Payment
33
Questions ?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.